On 06/15/2013 02:01 AM, csn233 wrote:
The 14 MB per GB is documented in the Squid wiki and based on the
observation that the avergae object size is 13 KB.
If you only have 20-30% of the formula you may have a larger average
object size or only use 20-30% of the confgured disk cache.
Yes, it
Hi There,
I need to build a proxy server for an ISP handling about 4000 ip addresses
over a 125Mbps of Internet bandwidth and were wondering what the specs for
such a server would be? It's going to be a transparent squid server
configured with Tproxy running as a bridge.
I'm thinking of using
On 14/06/2013 10:15 p.m., Stephan Viljoen wrote:
Hi There,
I need to build a proxy server for an ISP handling about 4000 ip addresses
over a 125Mbps of Internet bandwidth and were wondering what the specs for
such a server would be? It's going to be a transparent squid server
configured with
On 06/14/2013 07:15 AM, Stephan Viljoen wrote:
Hi There,
I need to build a proxy server for an ISP handling about 4000 ip addresses
over a 125Mbps of Internet bandwidth and were wondering what the specs for
such a server would be? It's going to be a transparent squid server
configured with
With YMMV in mind, I get different mileage:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Marcus Kool
marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com wrote:
and if your network pipe has sufficient capacity, also fetching
an object again from the internet is can be faster than fetching from disk.
Your network may be fast, but
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:53:20PM +0800, csn233 wrote:
With YMMV in mind, I get different mileage:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Marcus Kool
marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com wrote:
and if your network pipe has sufficient capacity, also fetching
an object again from the internet is can be
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Hardware requirements.
On 14/06/2013 10:15 p.m., Stephan Viljoen wrote:
Hi There,
I need to build a proxy server for an ISP handling about 4000 ip
addresses over a 125Mbps of Internet bandwidth and were wondering what
the specs
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Marcus Kool
marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com wrote:
Overall, squid servers without disk cache can be faster than with disk cache,
so it is worth looking at it.
OVERALL, it either can be, or it cannot be. No two ways about it. OVERALL.
- more expensive (disks +
On 06/14/2013 05:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
So fast GHz ratings CPUs are better than more slower cores.
That depends on the difference in CPU speeds, of course. If you are
getting a reasonably fast modern CPU and want to maximize overall
performance on a fixed budget, then getting more
On 06/14/2013 01:03 PM, csn233 wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Marcus Kool
marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com wrote:
- more expensive (disks + battery-backed I/O controller)
Expensive disks/battery-backed are over-kill. More/adequate spindles
should do the job just as well. Why do you
without sacrificing to much speed.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Kool [mailto:marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 5:35 PM
To: csn233
Cc: Stephan Viljoen; squid-users@squid-cache.org; support and sales desk
URLfilterDB
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Hardware
: Friday, June 14, 2013 5:35 PM
To: csn233
Cc: Stephan Viljoen; squid-users@squid-cache.org; support and sales desk
URLfilterDB
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Hardware requirements.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:53:20PM +0800, csn233 wrote:
With YMMV in mind, I get different mileage:
On Fri
Hallo, Ricardo,
Du meintest am 14.06.13:
I think that if you can use a good Disc controller (with 1G+ of
cache) and make: 1 Raid10 for the SO with 4 discs
2 RAID10 for 2 disc_cache storages for squid with 4 discs each (or
even 2 RAID5 with 3 discs each)
Sorry - RAID10 decreases the
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Marcus Kool
marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com wrote:
The 14 MB per GB is documented in the Squid wiki and based on the
observation that the avergae object size is 13 KB.
If you only have 20-30% of the formula you may have a larger average
object size or only use
14 matches
Mail list logo
