On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
tor 2009-07-23 klockan 10:41 -0400 skrev Mike Diggins:
Thanks. If my requirements are to keep NTLM working, and have the MD
authentication ultimately authenticate against that same domain (somehow),
could I separate the two, and perhaps use a diffe
tor 2009-07-23 klockan 10:41 -0400 skrev Mike Diggins:
> Thanks. If my requirements are to keep NTLM working, and have the MD
> authentication ultimately authenticate against that same domain (somehow),
> could I separate the two, and perhaps use a different authenticator for
> the MD Auth part
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
fre 2009-07-17 klockan 14:23 -0400 skrev Mike Diggins:
I've been asked to investigate eliminating the Basic authentication option
due to the obvious security risks (I need to maintain NTLM though). After
some brief reading, it appears that Digest A
fre 2009-07-17 klockan 14:23 -0400 skrev Mike Diggins:
> I've been asked to investigate eliminating the Basic authentication option
> due to the obvious security risks (I need to maintain NTLM though). After
> some brief reading, it appears that Digest Authentication might work. Can
> I use Dig
I've been running squid-2.6.STABLE20 for a long time using a combination
of NTLM authentication, and Basic authentication for those that can't use
NTLM. My back end authenticator is Winbind to a Windows Domain. That's
been working very well.
I've been asked to investigate eliminating the Bas
