Guillaume Chartrand wrote:
Hi I run squid 2.6.STABLE12 on RHEL3 AS for web-caching and filtering
my internet. I use also Squidguard to block some sites. I configure
squid to run with WCCP v2 with my cisco router. So all my web-cache
traffic is redirected transparently to squid.
I don't know
, Repentigny
(450) 470-0911 poste 7218
-Message d'origine-
De : Thomas Harold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 7 mars 2008 11:38
À : Guillaume Chartrand
Cc : squid-users@squid-cache.org
Objet : Re: [squid-users] transparency Squid very slow internet
Guillaume Chartrand wrote:
Hi I run squid
Guillaume Chartrand wrote:
Hi I run squid 2.6.STABLE12 on RHEL3 AS for web-caching and filtering my
internet. I use also Squidguard to block some sites.
I configure squid to run with WCCP v2 with my cisco router. So all my web-cache
traffic is redirected transparently to squid.
I don't know
Hi I run squid 2.6.STABLE12 on RHEL3 AS for web-caching and filtering my
internet. I use also Squidguard to block some sites.
I configure squid to run with WCCP v2 with my cisco router. So all my web-cache
traffic is redirected transparently to squid.
I don't know why but when I activate the
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:36:52 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Transparency and blocking other proxies
To: Dwayne Hottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only solution we can think
fre 2006-04-21 klockan 12:38 -0700 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Only solution we can think of is a login and assign rights by IP, then
remove IP
after logout or timeout using a monitor. Squid can block by IP in
transparency.
We are looking into other ways though because this means editing the
ons 2006-04-19 klockan 15:35 -0700 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Then can we use Shorewall + squid to accomplish this task?
Yes, Shorewall like most other firewall products can be instructed to
block all Internet access...
If this is what you want to do is another question. You still have not
Quoting Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ons 2006-04-19 klockan 15:35 -0700 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Then can we use Shorewall + squid to accomplish this task?
Yes, Shorewall like most other firewall products can be instructed to
block all Internet access...
If this is what you want
ons 2006-04-19 klockan 20:08 -0400 skrev Dwayne Hottinger:
use Novell. Keep us posted on what you find out. Im sure Im not the only
network admin at a school that is curious how to keep kids (and teachers) from
Skirting around the Internet filter.
As always the first line of defense is to
Does it make ANY sense, to use transparency mode on a network
that already
has routers in place?
These 2 issues are unrelated. The squid cache will optimize
Internet web access by caching sites (according to rules),
hence reducing bandwith.
Guess routers are always needed on an
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it make ANY sense, to use transparency mode on a network that already
has routers in place?
Yes, if you want to transparently intercept requests for port 80 without
requiring proxy settings in the browser. In such case it is best to
instruct
In transparency mode, browsers do not re-configurations. Also, sophisticated
end users can choose not to proxy at all.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 2:49 PM
Subject: [squid-users] Transparency Mode
Does it make ANY
Does it make ANY sense, to use transparency mode on a network that already
has routers in place?
I'm arguing with my netadmin on the best way to place the proxy server in
our environment.
TimR
I'm running Squid 2.5 STABLE4 in Transparency.
The proxy server is my gateway.
My NAT table looks as follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]# iptables -t nat -L
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
REDIRECT tcp -- anywhere anywhere
On Monday 17 November 2003 1:53 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Squid 2.5 STABLE4 in Transparency.
The proxy server is my gateway.
My NAT table looks as follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]# iptables -t nat -L
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source
in out source destination
Thanx for your additional info, Antony.
Regards,
Tim Rainier
Antony Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/17/2003 09:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: [squid-users] Transparency
On Monday 17 November 2003 1:53 pm
On Monday 17 November 2003 2:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]# iptables -t nat -L -n -v
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 49710 packets, 8766K bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
152 REDIRECT tcp --
There is a good one at:
http://en.tldp.org/HOWTO/TransparentProxy.html
I hope this helps.
-MBUCK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/30/03 08:49AM
I'm sure there's a faq or a specific document on setting up squid to
run
transparently. I cannot find it.
Can someone point me to one?
Regards,
Tim Rainier
have to allow https traffic, as well.
Can anyone please verify these two pieces before I tell my boss no? :-)
Regards,
Tim Rainier
Michael Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/30/2003 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: [squid-users
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first is authentication. That howto specifically says that you cannot
use authentication via transparency.
Correct.
Interception abuses fundamental TCP/IP design properties, and can not
solve all problems. It is generally an evil hack.
The
20 matches
Mail list logo
