Hey , guys,
Recently I did some interesting performance testing .
I used memory only for the squid configuration . when I set the the
cache_mem to following value , I got incresed CPU utilization .
cache_mem 4096 MB, cpu :73% (the value from top or squidclient mgr:info)
cache_mem 6144 MB , c
On lör, 2008-06-14 at 14:10 +0800, Arkin, Y wrote:
> Configuration:
> ./configure --enable-dlmalloc ...etc...
Hmm.. don't use --enable-dlmalloc if you have more than 2 GB of memory,
or at all if you have a reasonably modern OS.. (i.e. almost anything
released this millenium)
> one Squid instanc
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Henrik Nordstrom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> one Squid instance is running on the cache server ,
>> squid .conf :
>> cache_mem 8192 MB
>> maximum_object_size_in_memory 2048 KB
>
> This may be the culpit. Squid-2 is very very poor at handling large
> objects in m
On lör, 2008-06-14 at 07:55 -0700, Neil Harkins wrote:
> > This may be the culpit. Squid-2 is very very poor at handling large
> > objects in memory, wasting exponential amount of CPU the larger the
> > object is.. This is fixed in Squid-3.
>
> Could you please provide a link to that bug?
Not sur
Henrik , Neil ,
Thanks a lot for your response !!
I got several times sent mail failure notice , so I resend it again .
hope you could get it .
Acctually , I tried to use Linux OS default malloc, gnu malloc , dlmalloc,
dlmalloc could help me get the best performance among the three different
mall
On sön, 2008-06-15 at 10:57 +0800, Arkin Y wrote:
> Acctually , I tried to use Linux OS default malloc, gnu malloc , dlmalloc,
> dlmalloc could help me get the best performance among the three different
> malloc .
Interesting.
For me dlmalloc fails completely when the process size goes above 2G
Henrik,
I used the memory cache only configuration without disk store
So :
cache_dir null /tmp
On start up :
Using 8192 Store buckets ..
Is there any other information needed in order to analyze such problem ?
Thanks ,
-Arkin
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Henrik Nordstrom
<[EMAIL PROT
On mån, 2008-06-16 at 13:14 +0800, Arkin Y wrote:
> Henrik,
>
> I used the memory cache only configuration without disk store
> So :
> cache_dir null /tmp
>
> On start up :
> Using 8192 Store buckets ..
>
> Is there any other information needed in order to analyze such problem ?
No, file a bu
