On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> Is there a way to get squid to pass weatherbug requests straight out w/o
> trying to cache data in RAM or on DISK?
See the no_cache directive and/or the Squid FAQ on the same question.
Regards
Henrik
> Is there a way to get squid to pass weatherbug requests straight out w/o
> trying to cache data in RAM or on DISK?
> Squid just gets larger and larger.
What do you mean - the Squid process takes up more memory, the on-disk cache
grows, or your log file grows?
If you mean your log files gr
Is there a way to get squid to pass weatherbug requests straight out w/o
trying to cache data in RAM or on DISK?
I cannot get weatherbug to NOT use the proxy server settings in control
panel. (I asked...thats the way it is)
So what can I do?
Squid just gets larger and larger.
1066251745.272 1
