I was thinking of building several boxes with between 10TB and 20TB of
SATA drives, for some squid caches.
Has any used squid to cache that much data?
Any idea what the upper limit is? The practical limit?
-Vickers
> I was thinking of building several boxes with between 10TB and 20TB of
> SATA drives, for some squid caches.
>
> Has any used squid to cache that much data?
>
> Any idea what the upper limit is? The practical limit?
How much RAM would be required to index all that? Our cache runs at
about 90Gb
Mark Vickers wrote:
I was thinking of building several boxes with between 10TB and 20TB of
SATA drives, for some squid caches.
Has any used squid to cache that much data?
Hi Mark,
I am using up to 1 TB for my caches. However only about 500 GB are
interconnected to each other currently due to
Mark Vickers disse na ultima mensagem:
> I was thinking of building several boxes with between 10TB and 20TB of
> SATA drives, for some squid caches.
>
> Has any used squid to cache that much data?
>
> Any idea what the upper limit is? The practical limit?
>
Hi
not sure if you will get something
I'd assume that the limit on cached data for Squid is not the number
of bytes, but the number of cached objects?
If you were to tune squid to be aggressive about caching large popular
objects, then you could certainly fill a terabyte plus cache_dir, but
I'm not sure how cost effective it would be
On tor, 2007-08-02 at 20:20 -0400, Mark Vickers wrote:
> I was thinking of building several boxes with between 10TB and 20TB of
> SATA drives, for some squid caches.
You will require quite a bit of memory to use all of that for cache.
Rule of thumb: 10 MB of memory per GB of cache.
> Has any used
