Re: [squid-users] a keepalive problem about NTLM authentication pass through

Hi, How about this problem ? --mkishi On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Mikio Kishi mki...@104.net wrote: Hi, Amos Proxy-Connection is a non-standard header. Squid and other software used it incorrectly with an overlap in same meaning Connection. We have removed it from outgoing details at

Re: [squid-users] a keepalive problem about NTLM authentication pass through

Hi, Amos Proxy-Connection is a non-standard header. Squid and other software used it incorrectly with an overlap in same meaning Connection. We have removed it from outgoing details at the request of the HTTP RFC working group. hmmm Which browser and version is this please? IE8 on

Re: [squid-users] a keepalive problem about NTLM authentication pass through

Hi, Amos Very probably yes. The root cause of your problem is still not clear, it may be a duplicate or side effect of one of the other keep-alive problems which were tracked down and fixed. 3.1.8 as far as we can tell is completely keep-alive compliant with non-chunked requests. The

Re: [squid-users] a keepalive problem about NTLM authentication pass through

On 17/10/10 09:54, Mikio Kishi wrote: Hi, Amos Very probably yes. The root cause of your problem is still not clear, it may be a duplicate or side effect of one of the other keep-alive problems which were tracked down and fixed. 3.1.8 as far as we can tell is completely keep-alive compliant

Re: [squid-users] a keepalive problem about NTLM authentication pass through

Hi, Henrik Has the following already been fixed on squid-3.1.8 ? I'd like to know the current status about it. Sincerely, --mkishi 2010/6/7 Mikio Kishi mki...@104.net: Hi, Henrik Thank you for your reply. I'll wait it. Please fix it ! Sincerely, -- Mikio Kishi 2010/5/15 Henrik

Re: [squid-users] a keepalive problem about NTLM authentication pass through

On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:26:56 +0900, Mikio Kishi mki...@104.net wrote: Hi, Henrik Has the following already been fixed on squid-3.1.8 ? I'd like to know the current status about it. Very probably yes. The root cause of your problem is still not clear, it may be a duplicate or side effect of

Re: [squid-users] a keepalive problem about NTLM authentication pass through

Hi, Henrik Thank you for your reply. I'll wait it. Please fix it ! Sincerely, -- Mikio Kishi 2010/5/15 Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net: fre 2010-05-14 klockan 23:01 +0900 skrev Mikio Kishi: The first condition orig_request-flags.must_keepalive should have triggered when

Re: [squid-users] a keepalive problem about NTLM authentication pass through

Hi, Henrik The first condition orig_request-flags.must_keepalive should have triggered when seeing NTLM/Negotiate/Kerberos passthru. I think so, too ! Could you fix it ? Sincerely, -- Mikio Kishi 2010/5/13 Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net: ons 2010-05-12 klockan 18:54 +0900

Re: [squid-users] a keepalive problem about NTLM authentication pass through

fre 2010-05-14 klockan 23:01 +0900 skrev Mikio Kishi: The first condition orig_request-flags.must_keepalive should have triggered when seeing NTLM/Negotiate/Kerberos passthru. I think so, too ! Could you fix it ? If I had a bit of free time yes. You are welcome to give it a stab if you

[squid-users] a keepalive problem about NTLM authentication pass through

Hi, There may be a situation which we can't pass through HTTP with NTLM authentication bacause of lack of keepalive. cache_peer XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX parent 8080 0 no-query connection-auth=on always_direct allow all In above case, squid does not output Proxy-Connection: keep-alive to cache peer

Re: [squid-users] a keepalive problem about NTLM authentication pass through

ons 2010-05-12 klockan 18:54 +0900 skrev Mikio Kishi: http.c:HttpStateData::sendRequest() 1998 /* 1999 * Is keep-alive okay for all request methods? 2000 */ 2001 if (orig_request-flags.must_keepalive) 2002 flags.keepalive = 1; 2003 else