[squid-users] any thought to making collapsed_forwarding acl-based?

2008-02-22 Thread Neil Harkins
hi. this might belong on squid-dev, but figure i'll try here first. squid doesn't know if an object is even cacheable until it gets the headers back from origin, thus collapsed forwarding seems to impair performance of non-cacheable content, by blocking what will have to be a separate request anyw

Re: [squid-users] any thought to making collapsed_forwarding acl-based?

2008-02-24 Thread Amos Jeffries
Neil Harkins wrote: hi. this might belong on squid-dev, but figure i'll try here first. squid doesn't know if an object is even cacheable until it gets the headers back from origin, thus collapsed forwarding seems to impair performance of non-cacheable content, by blocking what will have to be a

Re: [squid-users] any thought to making collapsed_forwarding acl-based?

2008-02-24 Thread Henrik Nordström
fre 2008-02-22 klockan 16:20 -0800 skrev Neil Harkins: > most site administrators know what's cacheable or not on their site, > and could craft regex to differentiate thus collapsed_forwarding > being acl-based would be extremely beneficial, but it appears > to be global on/off today. is this conc