SNIP
it seems like if a server (apache,nginx) is responding to a range
request with the full file the player will get it without any problem
despite the range request.
so if you do have a current cache with a lot of files you can still use it.
i also got into this nice project:
Cached Contents are so many
-Youtube
-GoogleSyndication
-ADS and it will always give me a strong headache to follow every ADby
caching its content not to block it because blocking any ADS URL would
present a javascript error at the browser's side!.
-VideoZer
- android Google ( MARKET ..
well a nice list.
all the filesharing sites are not something i really want to cache
because the effort to understand most of the sites is too much then the
benefit.
megavideo got shutdown.
what i'm and others are very interested is microsoft windows updates.
they are using a 206 range
On 24/04/2012 21:02, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
as for some people asking me recently about youtube cache i have checked
again and found that youtube changed their video uris and added an
argument called range that is managed by the youtube player.
the original url\uri dosnt include range but the
Hello Eliezer,
Are you trying to save all video chunks into same parts or capture /
download the whole video object through CURL or whatever! but i dont
think it should work since it will occure an error with the new
Youtube Player.
What I have reached lately is saving same youtube video chunks
On 30/04/2012 02:18, Ghassan Gharabli wrote:
Hello Eliezer,
Are you trying to save all video chunks into same parts or capture /
download the whole video object through CURL or whatever! but i dont
think it should work since it will occure an error with the new
Youtube Player.
What I have
On 27/04/2012 11:56, Hasanen AL-Bana wrote:
I get around 40,000 req/min, the server is Dell R510 with Xeon cpu and
48GB of RAM, all disks are SAS (1.2TB)
Reducing the number of url_rewriters cause squid to stop working and
cache.log says more url_rewriters are needed...ah I forgot to say that
I
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il wrote:
On 25/04/2012 20:48, Hasanen AL-Bana wrote:
wouldn't be better if we save the video chunks ? youtube is streaming
files with 1.7MB flv chunks, youtube flash player knows how to merge
them and play themso the
On 27/04/2012 09:52, Hasanen AL-Bana wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Eliezer Croitoruelie...@ngtech.co.il wrote:
On 25/04/2012 20:48, Hasanen AL-Bana wrote:
wouldn't be better if we save the video chunks ? youtube is streaming
files with 1.7MB flv chunks, youtube flash player knows
I get around 40,000 req/min, the server is Dell R510 with Xeon cpu and
48GB of RAM, all disks are SAS (1.2TB)
Reducing the number of url_rewriters cause squid to stop working and
cache.log says more url_rewriters are needed...ah I forgot to say that
I have many URL_REWRITERS beside my store_url
Stripping range work for me, now i can save the whole video.
disadvantage of saving chunk file, same video could have some chunks.
right now we could save 1.7M chunk file, nexti time youtube change
range paremeter to 2.3M,
it will download the same video again with different size.
disadvantage of
Hi,
On Thursday 26 April 2012 03:44:58 Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
as i already answered a detailed answer to Ghassan.
i think that caching the chunks if possible is pretty good thing.
i tried it with nginx but havnt got the option to try it with
store_url_rewrite.
To maybe save you some work,
Hello,
On Thursday 26 April 2012 10:15:33 johan firdianto wrote:
This range behaviour related with error occured in youtube flash player ?
i'm using url rewrite if any range parameter in uri videos, i stripp off.
i can save the whole file of video to directory, by parsing store.log
and
This range behaviour related with error occured in youtube flash player ?
i'm using url rewrite if any range parameter in uri videos, i stripp off.
i can save the whole file of video to directory, by parsing store.log
and retrieve the same video using curl/wget.
The problem, when the same video is
On 26/04/2012 11:15, johan firdianto wrote:
This range behaviour related with error occured in youtube flash player ?
i'm using url rewrite if any range parameter in uri videos, i stripp off.
i can save the whole file of video to directory, by parsing store.log
and retrieve the same video using
On 25/04/2012 20:48, Hasanen AL-Bana wrote:
wouldn't be better if we save the video chunks ? youtube is streaming
files with 1.7MB flv chunks, youtube flash player knows how to merge
them and play themso the range start and end will alaways be the
same for the same video as long as user
On 25/04/2012 06:02, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 25/04/2012 6:02 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
as for some people asking me recently about youtube cache i have
checked again and found that youtube changed their video uris and
added an argument called range that is managed by the youtube player.
the
Hello,
As i remember I already discussed this subject before mentioning that
Youtube several months ago added a new variable/URI RANGE. I tried
to deny all URLs that comes with RANGE to avoid presenting the error
at Youtube Player butb tried to investigate more and came with a
solution like that
wouldn't be better if we save the video chunks ? youtube is streaming
files with 1.7MB flv chunks, youtube flash player knows how to merge
them and play themso the range start and end will alaways be the
same for the same video as long as user doesn't fast forward it or do
something
On 25/04/2012 20:39, Ghassan Gharabli wrote:
Hello,
As i remember I already discussed this subject before mentioning that
Youtube several months ago added a new variable/URI RANGE. I tried
to deny all URLs that comes with RANGE to avoid presenting the error
at Youtube Player butb tried to
On 25/04/2012 20:48, Hasanen AL-Bana wrote:
wouldn't be better if we save the video chunks ? youtube is streaming
files with 1.7MB flv chunks, youtube flash player knows how to merge
them and play themso the range start and end will alaways be the
same for the same video as long as user
as for some people asking me recently about youtube cache i have checked
again and found that youtube changed their video uris and added an
argument called range that is managed by the youtube player.
the original url\uri dosnt include range but the youtube player is using
this argument to save
On 25/04/2012 6:02 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
as for some people asking me recently about youtube cache i have
checked again and found that youtube changed their video uris and
added an argument called range that is managed by the youtube player.
the original url\uri dosnt include range but
23 matches
Mail list logo
