fre 2008-04-18 klockan 15:57 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:
It looks like Henrik has fixed the problem in the same way our patch
works. It'll be in the next round of snapshots.
Yes I did.
Regards
Henrik
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
mån 2008-04-14 klockan 20:13 -0700 skrev Anil Saini:
actually its is thr in squid.conf fine that max limit is 32
but i increased the limit to 60..and no of dns processes
increases...but i
dont know it will effect the squid or not
Guy Helmer wrote:
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
mån 2008-04-14 klockan 20:13 -0700 skrev Anil Saini:
actually its is thr in squid.conf fine that max limit is 32
but i increased the limit to 60..and no of dns processes
increases...but i
dont know it will effect the
mån 2008-04-14 klockan 20:13 -0700 skrev Anil Saini:
actually its is thr in squid.conf fine that max limit is 32
but i increased the limit to 60..and no of dns processes increases...but i
dont know it will effect the squid or not
If the number of helpers increased then it worked.
The
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
mån 2008-04-14 klockan 20:13 -0700 skrev Anil Saini:
actually its is thr in squid.conf fine that max limit is 32
but i increased the limit to 60..and no of dns processes increases...but i
dont know it will effect the squid or not
If the number of helpers
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008, Guy Helmer wrote:
Is this true for 2.6? I had to enable dns_defnames in response to a
customer requirement, and found that I had to rebuild 2.6.18 with
--disable-internal-dns so dns_defnames would work.
Doesn't it pick that stuff up from /etc/resolv.conf w/ the
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008, Guy Helmer wrote:
Is this true for 2.6? I had to enable dns_defnames in response to a
customer requirement, and found that I had to rebuild 2.6.18 with
--disable-internal-dns so dns_defnames would work.
Doesn't it pick that stuff up from
tis 2008-04-15 klockan 11:19 -0500 skrev Guy Helmer:
Another way is to build Squid without --disable-internal-dns. This will
remove this directive as it isn't even relevant any more..
Is this true for 2.6?
Yes.
I had to enable dns_defnames in response to a customer requirement,
and
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
tis 2008-04-15 klockan 11:19 -0500 skrev Guy Helmer:
Another way is to build Squid without --disable-internal-dns. This will
remove this directive as it isn't even relevant any more..
Is this true for 2.6?
Yes.
I had to enable dns_defnames in
tis 2008-04-15 klockan 15:44 -0500 skrev Guy Helmer:
Does this mean it ignores the domain directive in resolv.conf? That's
what I use on my systems instead of search.
Yes, it seems so (from reading the source).
Regards
Henrik
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
mån 2008-04-14 klockan 20:13 -0700 skrev Anil Saini:
actually its is thr in squid.conf fine that max limit is 32
but i increased the limit to 60..and no of dns processes
increases...but i
dont know it will effect the squid or not
If the number of helpers
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008, Guy Helmer wrote:
Is this true for 2.6? I had to enable dns_defnames in response to a
customer requirement, and found that I had to rebuild 2.6.18 with
--disable-internal-dns so dns_defnames would work.
Doesn't it pick that stuff up from
lör 2008-04-12 klockan 12:07 -0700 skrev Anil Saini:
where i have make change in source code in order to increase dns_children to
more than 32
Is there really a limit of 32? Not so sure...
What happens if you try to set it higher?
Regards
Henrik
actually its is thr in squid.conf fine that max limit is 32
but i increased the limit to 60..and no of dns processes increases...but i
dont know it will effect the squid or notproblem that i was facing is
solved to some extend.
Anil Saini wrote:
where i have to make changes in
where i have make change in source code in order to increase dns_children to
more than 32
-
Anil Saini
M.E. - Software Systems
B.E. - Electronics and Communication
Project Assistant
CISCO LAB
Information Processing Center Unit
BITS-PILANI
--
View this message in context:
15 matches
Mail list logo
