hi
please i have a forward loop warning in my cache.log what is the cause of it
i check the internet and find the cause is using peer squid configuration and
the two cache server has the same visible_hostname but i never used the peer in
my configuration i have one cache server with intercept con
Hi Mustafa,
Can you please post your squid.conf ? (Remove all comments and passwords
etc)
Cheers,
Pieter
On 2/02/2012 23:04, Mustafa Raji wrote:
hi
please i have a forward loop warning in my cache.log what is the cause of it
i check the internet and find the cause is using peer squid config
mustafa.r...@yahoo.com
cachemgr_passwd x all
thank you with my best regards
--- On Thu, 2/2/12, Pieter De Wit wrote:
> From: Pieter De Wit
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] forward loop
> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Date: Thursday, February 2, 2012, 10:08 AM
> Hi Mustafa,
>
From: Pieter De Wit
Subject: Re: [squid-users] forward loop
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Date: Thursday, February 2, 2012, 10:08 AM
Hi Mustafa,
Can you please post your squid.conf ? (Remove all comments
and passwords
etc)
Cheers,
Pieter
On 2/02/2012 23:04, Mustafa Raji wrote:
hi
please i h
On 4/02/2012 8:02 p.m., Mustafa Raji wrote:
hi Pieter
this is my configuration file,
#define access list for network
acl my_network src 192.168.12.0/24
acl my_network src 192.168.7.0/24
acl my_network src 192.168.40.0/24
acl my_network src 10.10.10.0/24
#allow http access for the network
http_a
On 5/02/2012 12:25 a.m., Mustafa Raji wrote:
dear Amos
this is my iptables rule the same as i read in the link that you told me about
it defintilly the problem is in the iptables rule,
my machine ip address is 192.168.40.2
iptables rule is
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s 192.168.40.2 -p tcp --d
Hello everybody.
I ran out of space on my squid log directory because cache.log grew very
fast filled by "forward loop detected" messages.
I'm using my squid as a transparent proxy.
What does that forward loop mean and how could it happen? I've noticed
that the originating IP was from a PC I had
On 20/05/11 00:24, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
Hello everybody.
I ran out of space on my squid log directory because cache.log grew very
fast filled by "forward loop detected" messages.
I'm using my squid as a transparent proxy.
What does that forward loop mean
Your squid is sending requests out
Hello Amos...
> > What does that forward loop mean
>
> Your squid is sending requests out which subsequently arrive
> back to it.
OK.
> > and how could it happen? I've noticed
>
> Most likely your NAT rules are broken. Packets leaving Squid
> MUST NOT be sent back to Squids listening port.
On 20/05/11 03:01, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
Hello Amos...
What does that forward loop mean
Your squid is sending requests out which subsequently arrive
back to it.
OK.
and how could it happen? I've noticed
Most likely your NAT rules are broken. Packets leaving Squid
MUST NOT be sent back
Hello again Amos, you're precious debugger of my situation! :-)
> > What you see there are some services redirected to my
> internal servers
> > and the rule for intercepting web traffic...
>
> Okay. Looks okay. The use of "eth0" replaces a specific Squid bypass.
> Squid will be using the Int
On 20/05/11 19:06, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
Hello again Amos, you're precious debugger of my situation! :-)
What you see there are some services redirected to my
internal servers
and the rule for intercepting web traffic...
Okay. Looks okay. The use of "eth0" replaces a specific Squid bypass
Hy Amos...
[cut]
> .. or in this case, it appears, some security penetration
> testing software. Somehow installed on a users PC.
>
> > Here you can find trace: http://www.sendspace.com/file/ij5qpe
> >
>
> Sorry, that seems to be a summary packet log. Just confirms
Sorry, I just took over y
On 21/05/11 00:36, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
Hy Amos...
[cut]
.. or in this case, it appears, some security penetration
testing software. Somehow installed on a users PC.
Here you can find trace: http://www.sendspace.com/file/ij5qpe
Sorry, that seems to be a summary packet log. Just confirm
Alright Amos!
> > Well, maybe! But that's weird behaviour... why should my
> "protection
> > suite" scan my whole subnet on port 80?
>
> From the (marketing) docs that particular McAfee component
> is designed for admins to do network wide security with.
> Active scans are one way to do thin
15 matches
Mail list logo