Re: [squid-users] how .htaccess gets cached and works with Last-Modified

2010-05-13 Thread Henrik Nordström
tor 2010-05-13 klockan 14:17 +0300 skrev Reverse Squid: > Response looks like: > > HTTP/1.0 200 OK > Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 11:14:12 GMT > Server: Apache > Last-Modified: Sun, 09 May 2010 09:21:50 GMT > Accept-Ranges: bytes > Content-Length: 97736 > Pragma: TEST > Cache-Control: must-revalidate >

Re: [squid-users] how .htaccess gets cached and works with Last-Modified

2010-05-12 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2010-05-12 klockan 15:48 +0300 skrev Reverse Squid: > Hello List, > > We have an .htaccess in a certain directory in our origin server which > redirects requests upon USER-AGENT. > How does Squid treat that .htaccess? Depends on what the HTTP response looks like. > If it were to cache it, as

[squid-users] how .htaccess gets cached and works with Last-Modified

2010-05-12 Thread Reverse Squid
Hello List, We have an .htaccess in a certain directory in our origin server which redirects requests upon USER-AGENT. How does Squid treat that .htaccess? If it were to cache it, as it itself does not change, all requests will follow the first USER-AGENT, ie, if I come with Firefox 2.0 I get redi