RE: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE

2003-06-04 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
tis 2003-06-03 klockan 14.26 skrev Eric Ferguson: > Do you know if we do decide to do NTLM authentication and NOT use the > no_check helper if Squid actually has to be joined into the AD domain? There is no need to join a domain with this helper. Only winbind requires joining the domain. -- D

Re: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE

2003-06-04 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
erry > > > - Original Message - > From: "McWhirter,Julia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jerry Murdock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Eric Ferguson" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 5:0

RE: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE

2003-06-03 Thread Eric Ferguson
-Original Message- From: Jerry Murdock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:24 AM To: McWhirter,Julia; Eric Ferguson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE Think that's it. not sure if they will NEVER get a prompt, I haven't played with

Re: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE

2003-06-03 Thread Jerry Murdock
D]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 5:04 AM Subject: RE: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE Jerry, Sorry to but in on this but I am also very interested in the logging of user information without the hassle of authentication. Did you mean the no_check helper? And with this

RE: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE

2003-06-03 Thread McWhirter,Julia
gt; To: Eric Ferguson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE > > If you really don't care about authentication, one of the NTLM helpers > doesn't check passwords - just accepts whatever the browser feeds it. > > Jerry > - Original Me

Re: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE

2003-06-03 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Monday 02 June 2003 23.36, Eric Ferguson wrote: > I am using proxy authentication for squid. My clients are being > prompted for user name and password and being authenticated > correctly- so far so good. However, I thought IE would send an > initial ID and password for the currently authenti

Re: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE

2003-06-03 Thread Jerry Murdock
MAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 8:20 PM Subject: RE: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE > Hi Jerry, > > Just to make sure I am thinking right then, I need to get NTLM > authentication running in order to avoid the popups?

RE: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE

2003-06-03 Thread Eric Ferguson
Eric Ferguson Subject: Re: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE The behavior your describing is characteristic of NTLM authentication. With any basic authenticator, you will still get the initial user/pw prompt. Jerry - Original Message - From: "Eric Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [squid-users] pam_auth and IE

2003-06-03 Thread Christoph Haas
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:36:12PM -0400, Eric Ferguson wrote: > I am using proxy authentication for squid. My clients are being > prompted for user name and password and being authenticated correctly- > so far so good. However, I thought IE would send an initial ID and > password for the current

[squid-users] pam_auth and IE

2003-06-03 Thread Eric Ferguson
Hi All, I am using proxy authentication for squid. My clients are being prompted for user name and password and being authenticated correctly- so far so good. However, I thought IE would send an initial ID and password for the currently authenticated user on its first attempt to authenticate and

[squid-users] pam_auth and IE

2003-06-03 Thread Eric Ferguson
Hi All, I am using proxy authentication for squid. My clients are being prompted for user name and password and being authenticated correctly- so far so good. However, I thought IE would send an initial ID and password for the currently authenticated user on its first attempt to authenticate and