lör 2010-02-20 klockan 03:40 -0200 skrev H:
# use 'allow-miss' to disable Squid's use of only-if-cached when forwarding
requests to siblings.
eventually needs better explanation/clarification
It's a fine tuning, to allow the sibling to refresh it's cache content
if the hit is on a stale
says exactly the same as in squid.conf.default about allow-miss, and for me
disable only-if-cached is allow miss and should not return
ERR_ACCESS_DENIED right?
Is the proxy allowed to use it's sibling? The sibling need to allow
access to the proxy in http_access.
sure it is
log? don't
H wrote:
fre 2010-02-19 klockan 03:08 -0200 skrev H:
Thing is, all three as parent with no-query round-robin get equal load as
supposed, but, giving one (any) of them weight=2 makes no difference, still
gets the same load.
How much traffic do you have?
10Mbit/s plus 8Mbit/s on each parent
well, it was a try since weight does not weight ... btw, the above problem
(not weighting) applies to icp as well
Well, Henrik omitted this...
When enabled, ICMP RTT measurement is used and weight=N is combined with
the RTT to bend the closest peer selection method and
lör 2010-02-20 klockan 11:40 -0200 skrev H:
hum, ever when I hear combined I get scared ... A with B or B with A and how
much of each ... :)
ICMP is best left disabled imho.. except for a few very specific cases.
ICMP enable you mean squid's icmp right?
Yes.
it is not since I use no-query
fre 2010-02-19 klockan 03:08 -0200 skrev H:
Thing is, all three as parent with no-query round-robin get equal load as
supposed, but, giving one (any) of them weight=2 makes no difference, still
gets the same load.
How much traffic do you have?
So I thought doing this
cache_peer
fre 2010-02-19 klockan 03:08 -0200 skrev H:
Thing is, all three as parent with no-query round-robin get equal load as
supposed, but, giving one (any) of them weight=2 makes no difference, still
gets the same load.
How much traffic do you have?
10Mbit/s plus 8Mbit/s on each parent cache
Hi
For squid-2.7-STABLE8
Does weight=N influence round-robin selection algorithm?
But firstable, does weight has the same definition for ICP and http (no-query)
protocol?
thank's
H
(17)8111.3300
tor 2010-02-18 klockan 08:42 -0200 skrev H:
For squid-2.7-STABLE8
Does weight=N influence round-robin selection algorithm?
Yes.
But firstable, does weight has the same definition for ICP and http (no-query)
protocol?
Yes, but what is being weighted differs slightly so proportions differ
Does weight=N influence round-robin selection algorithm?
Yes.
But firstable, does weight has the same definition for ICP and http
(no-query)
protocol?
Yes, but what is being weighted differs slightly so proportions differ
somewhat for the same weight in different peering protocols.
10 matches
Mail list logo
