On 12/06/2013 8:24 a.m., Guillermo Javier Nardoni - Grupo GERYON wrote:
Hello everyone,
We have this situation and we tried a lot of configurations without success.
• 1000 Customers
• 4 Caches BOX running Squid 2.7 on Debian Squeeze • Caches are full-meshed
to each other • Every Squid is
Hey Amos,
I am unsure about one thing.
in a case of carp array the related documents are:
-
http://etutorials.org/Server+Administration/Squid.+The+definitive+guide/Chapter+10.+Talking+to+Other+Squids/10.9+Cache+Array+Routing+Protocol/
- http://docs.huihoo.com/gnu_linux/squid/html/x2398.html
-
Hello everyone,
We have this situation and we tried a lot of configurations without success.
1000 Customers
4 Caches BOX running Squid 2.7 on Debian Squeeze Caches are full-meshed
to each other Every Squid is running in transparent mode (http_port 3128
transparent) Every Squid is
On 6/11/2013 11:24 PM, Guillermo Javier Nardoni - Grupo GERYON wrote:
Hello everyone,
We have this situation and we tried a lot of configurations without success.
• 1000 Customers
• 4 Caches BOX running Squid 2.7 on Debian Squeeze • Caches are full-meshed
to each other • Every Squid is running
On 6/11/2013 11:24 PM, Guillermo Javier Nardoni - Grupo GERYON wrote:
Hello everyone,
We have this situation and we tried a lot of configurations without success.
• 1000 Customers
• 4 Caches BOX running Squid 2.7 on Debian Squeeze • Caches are full-meshed
to each other • Every Squid is running
On 06/11/2013 02:49 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
There is a small bug which when StoreID is being used the proxy asks
from the sibling only a StoreID url in the ICP requests.
If you do ask me I think that it should work this way
No, it should not. StoreID effect should be local. If somebody
On 6/12/2013 1:30 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 06/11/2013 02:49 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
There is a small bug which when StoreID is being used the proxy asks
from the sibling only a StoreID url in the ICP requests.
If you do ask me I think that it should work this way
No, it should not.
From: gi...@msn.com
To: squ...@treenet.co.nz
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Peering squid multiple instances.
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:12:15 +
Dear Amos,
Thank you for your response and better design tips. However i am not able to
comprehend
for
improvement are always welcome.
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:06:46 +1300
From: squ...@treenet.co.nz
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Peering squid multiple instances.
GIGO . wrote:
I have successfully setup running of multiple
I have successfully setup running of multiple instances of squid for the sake
of surviving a Cache directory failure. However I still have few confusions
regarding peering multiple instances of squid. Please guide me in this respect.
In my setup i percept that my second instance is doing
GIGO . wrote:
I have successfully setup running of multiple instances of squid for the sake
of surviving a Cache directory failure. However I still have few confusions
regarding peering multiple instances of squid. Please guide me in this respect.
In my setup i percept that my second
Hello,
I'm using the latest Squid 3 Beta (squid-3.0-PRE3-20050427) as a reverse
proxy.
I have one server which does heavy image-calculations (it renders maps,
2-3 seconds for each image). Now I
added a second server and I would like to use the cache_peer option so
that each web accelerator
Hi,
I've problem with peering squid caches, since the
parent cache did not support ICP the rule below did
not work.
cache_peer 192.168.1.13 parent 3128 3130 no_query
Is it possible to configure child cache to use the
parent cache which disable icp_port?
regards,
karmila
On Saturday 06 September 2003 2:02 pm, Karmila Sari wrote:
Hi,
I've problem with peering squid caches, since the
parent cache did not support ICP the rule below did
not work.
cache_peer 192.168.1.13 parent 3128 3130 no_query
Is it possible to configure child cache to use the
parent
On Saturday 06 September 2003 08.05, Kenneth Oncinian wrote:
yes, you could disable it by
cache_peer 192.168.1.13 parent 3128 0 no_query
You also need prefer_direct off or never_direct allow all.
Regards
Henrik
--
Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful.
On my parent proxy however, I get constant 403's when the sibling
tries to query it. I suspect it is a acl that I am missing, but
I'm not sure what...
The other peer needs to be allowed to access the server in
http_access. If not they will be given 403 on attempt to access the
cache,
Lo everyone,
I have setup two squid servers in a parent sibling relation. The peering
itself seems to be setup correctly, both proxies start, and I can see that
both proxies contact each other via the cache log.
On my parent proxy however, I get constant 403's when the sibling tries to
query
Chris,
Isn't it possible that your cache peer requires authentication, or that
it doesn't allow your host?
rgrds,
Bart
Chris Knipe wrote:
Lo everyone,
I have setup two squid servers in a parent sibling relation. The peering
itself seems to be setup correctly, both proxies start, and
18 matches
Mail list logo
