Re: [squid-users] Re: RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-10 Thread F-D. Cami
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:56:26 +1200 Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michel (M) wrote: > > dns_testnames localhost > > > > IMO this nasty var really should disappear from squid.conf, seems from the > > 90's when dns server still where dark stuff for most > > Question for all users: >

Re: [squid-users] Re: RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-09 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On mån, 2008-06-09 at 23:56 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Question for all users: >Is anyone actually _needing_ this to stay? Or can we indeed drop it? I always run with the dns_testnames test disabled (-D command line option). Regards Henrik

Re: [squid-users] Re: RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-09 Thread Michel (M)
Amos Jeffries disse na ultima mensagem: > Michel (M) wrote: >> Ionel GARDAIS disse na ultima mensagem: >>> Hi Dean, >>> >>> I had these directives : >>> > dns_testnames apple.com redhat.com internic.net nlanr.net > append_domain .beicip.fr >>> I commented out "append_domain" as this is not

Re: [squid-users] Re: RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-09 Thread Amos Jeffries
Michel (M) wrote: Ionel GARDAIS disse na ultima mensagem: Hi Dean, I had these directives : dns_testnames apple.com redhat.com internic.net nlanr.net append_domain .beicip.fr I commented out "append_domain" as this is not relevant to our configuration now. both are kind of not important a

Re: [squid-users] Re: RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-09 Thread Michel (M)
Ionel GARDAIS disse na ultima mensagem: > Hi Dean, > > I had these directives : > >> > dns_testnames apple.com redhat.com internic.net nlanr.net >> > append_domain .beicip.fr >> > > I commented out "append_domain" as this is not relevant to our > configuration now. both are kind of not important

[squid-users] Re: RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-08 Thread Ionel GARDAIS
y, June 06, 2008 2:56 PM To: Henrik Nordstrom Cc: Squid Users Subject: [squid-users] RE : [squid-users] performances ... again Okay ... It's been the hardest 20 minutes of the day : find a few domain names that "should" have not been accessed and cached by our DNS. Well, from Pa

Re: [squid-users] RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 06.06.08 18:14, GARDAIS Ionel wrote: > I will try the "host != "some.url.com" part. > > For the isInNet() trick, the problem is that it inducts a DNS resolution > call for every request to compare with the IP/mask parameters. Don't you have local resolver? Do you think that your browser doesn'

Re: [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On fre, 2008-06-06 at 17:06 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > is using of > isInNet(host, "127.0.0.0", "255.0.0.0") > > not working? That relies on DNS lookups.. Regards Henrik

[squid-users] Re: RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
- nintendo.co.jp, Yamaha.co.jp, pioneer.co.jp : around 300ms > > Cached entries are returned in less than 1ms. > > Ionel > > > -Message d'origine- > De : Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : vendredi 6 juin 2008 21:05 > À : GARDAIS Ion

[squid-users] RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread Dean Weimer
Ionel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 2:56 PM To: Henrik Nordstrom Cc: Squid Users Subject: [squid-users] RE : [squid-users] performances ... again Okay ... It's been the hardest 20 minutes of the day : find a few domain names that "should" have not been access

[squid-users] RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
di 6 juin 2008 21:05 À : GARDAIS Ionel Cc : Squid Users Objet : Re: [squid-users] performances ... again On fre, 2008-06-06 at 14:37 +0200, Ionel GARDAIS wrote: > I got a user (whom I can trust) who uses an explicit proxy configuration > : there are no improvments. Ok. Then it's at t

Re: [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On fre, 2008-06-06 at 14:37 +0200, Ionel GARDAIS wrote: > I got a user (whom I can trust) who uses an explicit proxy configuration > : there are no improvments. Ok. Then it's at the proxy, or the DNS servers it uses. Remember that to diagnose DNS slowness you need to query for hosts and domains

[squid-users] RE : [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
--- De : Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : vendredi 6 juin 2008 17:07 À : squid-users@squid-cache.org Objet : Re: [squid-users] performances ... again On 06.06.08 14:37, Ionel GARDAIS wrote: > function FindProxyForURL(

Re: [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 06.06.08 14:37, Ionel GARDAIS wrote: > function FindProxyForURL(url,host) { >if ( >( >!( >host.indexOf('www.ifp.fr') == 0 >|| host.indexOf('validation.ifp.fr') == 0 >|| host.in

Re: [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread Ionel GARDAIS
I got a user (whom I can trust) who uses an explicit proxy configuration : there are no improvments. The pac we use is mostly made of a huge "if" which instruct user's browser to bypass the proxy and to go direct to some servers. Here is the pac : function FindProxyForURL(url,host) { if

Re: [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
Is there any difference if you configure the proxy explicit without using a PAC? Do you have any rules in the PAC depending on destinaion IP of the requested server? fre 2008-06-06 klockan 08:56 +0200 skrev Ionel GARDAIS: > Configured proxy for now. > I'm doing some network to see how can I use

Re: [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-06 Thread Ionel GARDAIS
Configured proxy for now. I'm doing some network to see how can I use squid in transparent interception without breaking the exclude rules ffrom the current pac we use. Ionel Henrik Nordstrom wrote: Configured proxy, or transparent interception? On fre, 2008-06-06 at 08:29 +0200, Ionel GA

Re: [squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
Configured proxy, or transparent interception? On fre, 2008-06-06 at 08:29 +0200, Ionel GARDAIS wrote: > DNS issues ... client side ? proxy side ? > clients resolve to Windows Server 2003 DNS for internal domain names. > These servers forward to DMZ DNS (running bind) for internal view of > the D

Re: [squid-users] RE : [squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
tor 2008-06-05 klockan 19:10 +0200 skrev GARDAIS Ionel: > After rereading my post, I saw that I did not finish a line : > "[...] cache-misses median service times are around 200ms and cache-hits are > around 3ms" but we often see a 10-second lag for browser to start loading the > page. That's us

[squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread Dean Weimer
   Network Administrator Orscheln Management Co -Original Message- From: GARDAIS Ionel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 12:11 PM To: chris brain; squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: [squid-users] RE : [squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again Hi C

[squid-users] RE : [squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
ge. Ionel -Message d'origine- De : chris brain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 5 juin 2008 18:34 À : squid-users@squid-cache.org Objet : [squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again Hi Ionel, Your performance dont look that bad. Our stats roughly work out to be : 1

[squid-users] Re:[squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread chris brain
Hi Ionel, Your performance dont look that bad. Our stats roughly work out to be : 1000+ users NTLM auth Average HTTP requests per minute since start: 2990.8 with max 30% hits. (so your hits look coparable to us.) Our cache miss service time averages to about 160ms and cache hits service time ab

[squid-users] performances ... again

2008-06-05 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
Hi there, I've been looking around for performance issues and possible enhancement of generic squid configuration. We (in our company) are running a linux box with Squid (2.7Stable1, I try to stay up-to-date). The box is a PIII-1GHz with 512Mb of RAM and 3x18Gb hard-drives. Web access is provid