[squid-users] proxy: explicit & transparent + VideoCache

2009-08-05 Thread pavel kolodin
My squid + videocache returns HTTP 303 (see other) with URL "http://10.10.10.1/videocache/youtube/1231...5151.flv"; to browser. If i set proxy address and port in browser's settings, browser will do request to "http://10.10.10.1/videocache..."; returned with 303 by squid and successfully do

Re: [squid-users] proxy: explicit & transparent + VideoCache

2009-08-05 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 07:18:41 -, "pavel kolodin" wrote: > My squid + videocache returns HTTP 303 (see other) with URL > "http://10.10.10.1/videocache/youtube/1231...5151.flv"; to browser. > > If i set proxy address and port in browser's settings, browser will do > request to "http://10.10.

Re: [squid-users] proxy: explicit & transparent + VideoCache

2009-08-05 Thread pavel kolodin
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 07:18:41 -, "pavel kolodin" Why? Possible reasons: 1) 302 being the status you really want to use for this. 2) "transparent proxy" aka "intercepting proxy" aka "man-in-middle attack" perhapse the plugin is smart enough to detect such attacks and prevent them f

Re: [squid-users] proxy: explicit & transparent + VideoCache

2009-08-05 Thread pavel kolodin
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 05:34:09 -, Amos Jeffries wrote: Why? Possible reasons: 1) 302 being the status you really want to use for this. 2) "transparent proxy" aka "intercepting proxy" aka "man-in-middle attack" perhapse the plugin is smart enough to detect such attacks and prevent t

Re: [squid-users] proxy: explicit & transparent + VideoCache

2009-08-05 Thread Adrian Chadd
Have you asked the videocache group why it functions the way it functions? adrian 2009/8/6 pavel kolodin : > On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 05:34:09 -, Amos Jeffries > wrote: > > >>> Why? >> >> Possible reasons: >> >> 1) 302 being the status you really want to use for this. >> >> 2) "transparent prox