Re: [squid-users] question about filesystems and directories for cache.

2007-11-27 Thread Amos Jeffries
Tony Dodd wrote: Chris Robertson wrote: First of all, thanks for sharing the write-up. There are a number of high-load squid installations (Wikipedia, and Flikr are two of the largest I know of), but not much information on what tweaks to make in the interest of performance. No problem. =]

Re: [squid-users] question about filesystems and directories for cache.

2007-11-26 Thread Matias Lopez Bergero
Tony Dodd wrote: Matias Lopez Bergero wrote: Hello, snip I'm being reading the wiki and the mailing list to know, which is the best filesystem to use, for now I have chose ext3 based on comments on the list, also, I have passed the nodev,nosuid,noexec,noatime flags to fstab in order to

Re: [squid-users] question about filesystems and directories for cache.

2007-11-26 Thread Chris Robertson
Tony Dodd wrote: Matias Lopez Bergero wrote: Hello, snip I'm being reading the wiki and the mailing list to know, which is the best filesystem to use, for now I have chose ext3 based on comments on the list, also, I have passed the nodev,nosuid,noexec,noatime flags to fstab in order to get

Re: [squid-users] question about filesystems and directories for cache.

2007-11-26 Thread Tony Dodd
Chris Robertson wrote: First of all, thanks for sharing the write-up. There are a number of high-load squid installations (Wikipedia, and Flikr are two of the largest I know of), but not much information on what tweaks to make in the interest of performance. No problem. =] I encountered the

Re: [squid-users] question about filesystems and directories for cache.

2007-11-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
not actually using epoll. It might be a superfluous compile option. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# squidclient -p 8081 mgr:info |grep method IO loop method: poll Try --enable-epoll and see if your caches are faster? Adrian

Re: [squid-users] question about filesystems and directories for cache.

2007-11-24 Thread Tony Dodd
Matias Lopez Bergero wrote: Hello, snip I'm being reading the wiki and the mailing list to know, which is the best filesystem to use, for now I have chose ext3 based on comments on the list, also, I have passed the nodev,nosuid,noexec,noatime flags to fstab in order to get a security and

Re: [squid-users] question about filesystems and directories for cache.

2007-11-24 Thread Alexandre Correa
reiserfs 4 is much better than ext3 ... On Nov 24, 2007 9:55 PM, Tony Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matias Lopez Bergero wrote: Hello, snip I'm being reading the wiki and the mailing list to know, which is the best filesystem to use, for now I have chose ext3 based on comments on

Re: [squid-users] question about filesystems and directories for cache.

2007-11-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007, Alexandre Correa wrote: reiserfs 4 is much better than ext3 ... [citation needed] I know reiserfs vs ext2|3 benchmarks in the past showed reiserfs did a little better but both codebases have advanced over the last few years. I'd love to see an actual up to date comparison.

Re: [squid-users] question about filesystems and directories for cache.

2007-11-24 Thread Tony Dodd
Quoting Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, Nov 24, 2007, Alexandre Correa wrote: reiserfs 4 is much better than ext3 ... [citation needed] I know reiserfs vs ext2|3 benchmarks in the past showed reiserfs did a little better but both codebases have advanced over the last few years.

[squid-users] question about filesystems and directories for cache.

2007-11-23 Thread Matias Lopez Bergero
Hello, I'm installing a new squid server (I have a couple running already), but this is going to server as gateway for about 450 clients. I have a good piece of hardware for it, but I have just two hard discs RAID 1 mirrored. I'll like to get the best performance of this servers, and I think that