[squid-users] size of squid binary

2010-12-27 Thread Orestes Leal R.
I've built squid 3.1.10 on openbsd4.6 sucessfuly but my squid binary it's 40M of size, then I do a: strip --strip-unneeded squid to low this to 2M and all ok. it's this size by default normal? squid gets a debug build by default? LeaL

Re: [squid-users] size of squid binary

2010-12-27 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Orestes, Du meintest am 27.12.10: > I've built squid 3.1.10 on openbsd4.6 sucessfuly > but my squid binary it's 40M of size, then I do a: > strip --strip-unneeded squid > to low this to 2M and all ok. > it's this size by default normal? > squid gets a debug build by default? Slackware,

Re: [squid-users] size of squid binary

2011-01-13 Thread Henrik Nordström
mån 2010-12-27 klockan 11:00 -0600 skrev Orestes Leal R.: > I've built squid 3.1.10 on openbsd4.6 sucessfuly > but my squid binary it's 40M of size, then I do a: > it's this size by default normal? Yes. > squid gets a debug build by default? Yes, just as is done for virtually any Open Source so

Re: [squid-users] size of squid binary

2011-01-14 Thread Eda FLORAT
Hello, if accept loosing debug symbols and get stripped binary, can we say that stripped binary of squid will perform better? Thanks. -- King Regards Eda FLORAT 2011/1/13 Henrik Nordström : > mån 2010-12-27 klockan 11:00 -0600 skrev Orestes Leal R.: >> I've built squid 3.1.10 on openbsd4.6 suces

Re: [squid-users] size of squid binary

2011-01-14 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Eda FLORAT : > Hello, > > if accept loosing debug symbols and get stripped binary, can we say > that stripped binary of squid will perform better? Who said anything about performance? > > I kind of like the way this is handled in Fedora and perhaps other > > distributios as well, where package

Re: [squid-users] size of squid binary

2011-01-14 Thread Eda FLORAT
Hello again, 2011/1/14 Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Eda FLORAT : >> Hello, >> >> if accept loosing debug symbols and get stripped binary, can we say >> that stripped binary of squid will perform better? > > Who said anything about performance? No one have said. I just ask to learn. Thanks. > >> > I ki

Re: [squid-users] size of squid binary

2011-01-14 Thread Orestes Leal R.
* Eda FLORAT : Hello, if accept loosing debug symbols and get stripped binary, can we say that stripped binary of squid will perform better? I think it performs pretty much the same, the only differences between the 2 binary files (apart from size) are the new section (sections?) for de

Re: [squid-users] size of squid binary

2011-01-14 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 15/01/11 09:20, Orestes Leal R. wrote: * Eda FLORAT : Hello, if accept loosing debug symbols and get stripped binary, can we say that stripped binary of squid will perform better? I think it performs pretty much the same, the only differences between the 2 binary files (apart from siz

Re: [squid-users] size of squid binary

2011-01-18 Thread Henrik Nordström
fre 2011-01-14 klockan 21:06 +0200 skrev Eda FLORAT: > if accept loosing debug symbols and get stripped binary, can we say > that stripped binary of squid will perform better? There is a almost non-existing difference in startup time for loading the binary. Once started there is no difference in