Thanks Eliezer Croitoru this has been a helpful stuff .
ill let you know if found any difficulty in deplying procedure.
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il wrote:
On 29/04/2012 08:49, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
IT seems that things are doing good
On 29/04/2012 08:49, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
IT seems that things are doing good with out huge domain list. so now
my next goal is squidguard.
but the problem with squid guard was that i tried it configuring and
i saw many online manuals but it didnt activated so i just started
using
IT seems that things are doing good with out huge domain list. so now
my next goal is squidguard.
but the problem with squid guard was that i tried it configuring and
i saw many online manuals but it didnt activated so i just started
using domain list. however if thing doesnt work ill update the
i think the delay was due to the 10mb of domain list. it seems that
things are back to track now. however for further restriction ill look
into other solutions as suggested in this thread.
Thanks alot
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks , i learn
Thanks , i learn some thing new from you all. however ill update the
results in few days as i am monitoring the stuff as how things are
going.
Thanks,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 25/04/2012 3:34 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 24/04/2012
ok i just disabled all the rules and it works for me now ill test
which rule is making a problem and let you know also.
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:
here is the log for bbc.co.uk . first and last msg of log
so you can see the time
are you taking about the delay pools rules?
also if it's a proxy that is open to the internet i would limit the
access to port 3128 to only lan.
your http_access rules are allowing anyone to use the proxy for the
whitelist.
Regards,
Eliezer
On 24/04/2012 09:06, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
ok i trim down config file to this as you suggested of blocking
whitelist to local net.. let see how things work tommorw. ill update.
but block list is like 10MB big do you think it could be the
problem.as every query has to be matched with 10 MB database.
?
#-Allow All
On 24/04/2012 18:14, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
ok i trim down config file to this as you suggested of blocking
whitelist to local net.. let see how things work tommorw. ill update.
but block list is like 10MB big do you think it could be the
problem.as every query has to be matched with 10 MB
A 10 MB flat file of domains contains roughly 50 domains.
You also use time-based ACLs and ACLs based on IP address range.
This config can be implemented using ufdbGuard,
a free URL rewriter for Squid.
ufdbGuard is better maintained than squidGuard and has more
features.
Marcus
On
ok Thanks ill lookinto that as well
Thanks for letting me know
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Marcus Kool
marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com wrote:
A 10 MB flat file of domains contains roughly 50 domains.
You also use time-based ACLs and ACLs based on IP address range.
This config can be
On 25/04/2012 3:34 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 24/04/2012 18:14, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
ok i trim down config file to this as you suggested of blocking
whitelist to local net.. let see how things work tommorw. ill update.
but block list is like 10MB big do you think it could be the
well i have been experiencing slow Internet browsing. not very slow
but comparatively slower then IPCOP firewall. i can not understand how
come i diagnose the issue.
i mean. i increase the RAM , i checked the DNS every thing is fine but
my browser stuck at connecting ones it start download it do
On 23/04/2012 18:38, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
well i have been experiencing slow Internet browsing. not very slow
but comparatively slower then IPCOP firewall. i can not understand how
come i diagnose the issue.
i mean. i increase the RAM , i checked the DNS every thing is fine but
my browser
Here you go with my squid.conf
acl all src all
acl manager proto cache_object
acl localhost src 127.0.0.1/32
acl to_localhost dst 127.0.0.0/8
acl localnet src 10.0.0.0/8 # RFC1918 possible internal network
acl localnet src 172.16.0.0/12 # RFC1918 possible internal network
acl localnet src
here is the log for bbc.co.uk . first and last msg of log
so you can see the time delay.
335205033.183841 10.51.100.240 TCP_MISS/200 24506 GET
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ - DIRECT/212.58.244.66 text/html
1335205057.936328 10.51.100.240 TCP_REFRESH_HIT/304 435 GET
Hi, I am getting fairly slow times (this is more an observation than looking at
the logs) when loading web pages. I am the only person on an ADSL2+
connection, with squid setup and caching (see squid.conf below). Does anyone
have any ideas on how i could make it more responsive? Any other
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007, Adam Parsons wrote:
Hi, I am getting fairly slow times (this is more an observation than looking
at the logs) when loading web pages. I am the only person on an ADSL2+
connection, with squid setup and caching (see squid.conf below). Does anyone
have any ideas on how
Thanks Adrian, changing it to 64 256 has done the trick, now its almost instant.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, February 1, 2007 4:25 pm
To: Adam Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slow
Out of curiosity, if i leave out the cache_dir line, what settings would squid
use?
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, February 1, 2007 4:25 pm
To: Adam Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slow Internet
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007, Adam Parsons wrote:
Out of curiosity, if i leave out the cache_dir line, what settings would
squid use?
cache_dir ufs /path/to/default/cache 100 16 256 or something similar like that.
(I wish it were actually 'null', but thats just me.)
Adrian
21 matches
Mail list logo
