Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-12-02 Thread Graham Keeling
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:40:52AM +, Graham Keeling wrote: Hello, I am convinced that this is a serious bug, so I have entered a proper bug report. It is bug 3113: http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3113 I have created a simple patch that seems to fix the problem for me

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-12-01 Thread Graham Keeling
Hello, I am convinced that this is a serious bug, so I have entered a proper bug report. It is bug 3113: http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3113

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: Graham, This is the best explanation I have seen about ongoing upload problem in proxy chains where squid is one part of the chain. On our systems, we use Squid 3.0.STABLE25. Before squid a dansguardian(DG) proxy exist to filter. Results of my tests: 1-

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Oguz Yilmaz
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: Graham, This is the best explanation I have seen about ongoing upload problem in proxy chains where squid is one part of the chain. On our systems, we use Squid 3.0.STABLE25.

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 30/11/10 21:23, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Amos Jeffriessqu...@treenet.co.nz wrote: On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: Graham, This is the best explanation I have seen about ongoing upload problem in proxy chains where squid is one part of the chain. On our

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Oguz Yilmaz
-- Oguz YILMAZ On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: On 30/11/10 21:23, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Amos Jeffriessqu...@treenet.co.nz  wrote: On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: Graham, This is the best explanation I

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Graham Keeling
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:46:47PM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 30/11/10 21:23, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Amos Jeffriessqu...@treenet.co.nz wrote: On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: Graham, This is the best explanation I have seen about ongoing upload

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Graham Keeling
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:31:45AM +, Graham Keeling wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:46:47PM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 30/11/10 21:23, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Amos Jeffriessqu...@treenet.co.nz wrote: On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote:

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-29 Thread Oguz Yilmaz
Graham, This is the best explanation I have seen about ongoing upload problem in proxy chains where squid is one part of the chain. On our systems, we use Squid 3.0.STABLE25. Before squid a dansguardian(DG) proxy exist to filter. Results of my tests: 1- DG+Squid 2.6.STABLE12: No problem of

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-26 Thread Graham Keeling
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:36:49PM +, Graham Keeling wrote: Hello, I have upgraded to squid-3.1 recently, and found a change of behaviour. I have been using dansguardian in front of squid. It appears to be because squid now buffers uploaded POST data slightly differently. In versions

[squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-25 Thread Graham Keeling
Hello, I have upgraded to squid-3.1 recently, and found a change of behaviour. I have been using dansguardian in front of squid. It appears to be because squid now buffers uploaded POST data slightly differently. In versions 3.1, it would take some data, send it through to the website, and then