Re: [squid-users] squid 2.7 vs 3.x (was: Re: [squid-users] squid-2.7 pre-release testing)

2008-01-13 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 09:52 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote: On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, Marcus Kool wrote: I tried the FAQ and Squid website for some more info but I found none. The RoadMap2 and RoadMap3 are a bit vague to draw any conclusions. Thats because we're developers, not documentation

Re: [squid-users] squid 2.7 vs 3.x (was: Re: [squid-users] squid-2.7 pre-release testing)

2008-01-13 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, Robert Collins wrote: 3.x: has some internal code restructuring, is a C/C++ hybrid, includes integrated ICAP support; Amos has ipv6 support included in 3.HEAD. IIRC tagged delay pools were merged, definitely per-user delay pools (class 4 pools) support was

[squid-users] squid 2.7 vs 3.x (was: Re: [squid-users] squid-2.7 pre-release testing)

2008-01-12 Thread Marcus Kool
Adrian Chadd wrote: On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, J. Peng wrote: I'm just confused and upset, since squid 3.0 was already released officially, why keeping to release the lower version of squid yet? Ah, version number madness. They're diverging code trains. Squid-2.7 is the continuation of the

Re: [squid-users] squid 2.7 vs 3.x (was: Re: [squid-users] squid-2.7 pre-release testing)

2008-01-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, Marcus Kool wrote: I tried the FAQ and Squid website for some more info but I found none. The RoadMap2 and RoadMap3 are a bit vague to draw any conclusions. Thats because we're developers, not documentation authors. :) Can you be more elaborate ? What are the major