On 29/10/10 05:28, Rajkumar Seenivasan wrote:
switching from LFUDA to GDSF didn't make much of a difference.
I assume the following is happening...
I pre-cache around 2 to 3GB of data everyday and get 40 to 50% HITS everyday.
Check that those 40-50% hits are from actual visitors, not from your
Hi,
Can someone pls help fix my 2 issues?
I wish there was an equivalent of "reference_age" in 3.1
thanks.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Rajkumar Seenivasan wrote:
> switching from LFUDA to GDSF didn't make much of a difference.
>
> I assume the following is happening...
> I pre-cache aroun
switching from LFUDA to GDSF didn't make much of a difference.
I assume the following is happening...
I pre-cache around 2 to 3GB of data everyday and get 40 to 50% HITS everyday.
Once the cache_dir size reaches the cache_swap_low threshold, squid is
not aggressive enough in removing the old objec
Hello Amos,
see below for my responses... thx.
? 50% empty cache required so as not to fill RAM? => cache is too big or
RAM not enough.
cache usage size is approx. 6GB per day.
We have 15GB of physical memory on each box and the cache_dir is set for 20GB.
I had cache_swap_low 65 and cac
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:09:31 -0400, "Chad Naugle"
wrote:
> With that large array of RAM I would increase those maximum numbers, to
> let's say, 8 MB, 16 MB, 32 MB, especially if you plan on using heap
LFUDA,
> which is optimized for storing larger objects, and trashes smaller
objects
> faster, whe
With that large array of RAM I would increase those maximum numbers, to let's
say, 8 MB, 16 MB, 32 MB, especially if you plan on using heap LFUDA, which is
optimized for storing larger objects, and trashes smaller objects faster, where
heap GSDF is the opposite, using LRU for memory for the larg
