Re: [squid-users] squidclamav: Reduce overhead by omitting request-scanning?

2012-06-30 Thread H
Em Sat, 30 Jun 2012 12:51:58 +0200 Felix Leimbach escreveu: > Hi Amos > > On 06/30/2012 10:25 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > On 30/06/2012 7:20 p.m., Felix Leimbach wrote: > [...] > > > > 1) squidclamav is not part of the Squid project. So it is highly > > unlikely that people here are in a

Re: [squid-users] squidclamav: Reduce overhead by omitting request-scanning?

2012-06-30 Thread Felix Leimbach
Hi Amos On 06/30/2012 10:25 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 30/06/2012 7:20 p.m., Felix Leimbach wrote: Hello list I'm running squid 3.1.19 with squidclamav 6.6 and while debugging a different issue, I looked at tcpdumps of the ICAP traffic for squidclamav. I noticed that not only the webpages are

Re: [squid-users] squidclamav: Reduce overhead by omitting request-scanning?

2012-06-30 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 30/06/2012 7:20 p.m., Felix Leimbach wrote: Hello list I'm running squid 3.1.19 with squidclamav 6.6 and while debugging a different issue, I looked at tcpdumps of the ICAP traffic for squidclamav. I noticed that not only the webpages are sent to squidclamav for scanning, the *requests* are s

[squid-users] squidclamav: Reduce overhead by omitting request-scanning?

2012-06-30 Thread Felix Leimbach
Hello list I'm running squid 3.1.19 with squidclamav 6.6 and while debugging a different issue, I looked at tcpdumps of the ICAP traffic for squidclamav. I noticed that not only the webpages are sent to squidclamav for scanning, the *requests* are sent and scanned as well. This looks like unneces