Many admins will be happy to know about these domains.
Admins should properly maintained and fix them or maybe get some help in
finding the culprit for the problem.
As I posted before the ISOC list is full of requests for help regarding
similar problems and solutions for them else then the way
f there is any alternatives? I thought that squid 3.2 is doing
> parallel lookups to and A records?
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2013 10:54
> An: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Try to contact the dns servers maintainer using postmaster or any other
relevant address.
You can consult about it in ISOC mailing list.
BIND has very nice logging options about lazy and problematic dns
servers which can help you prevent these issues.
It's a very common problem in the dns wo
On 2/12/2013 2:09 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
No. A bug report will not make any difference here. dns_v4_first is
about the sorting the results found, not the lookup order. is
faster than A in most networks, so we perform that lookup first in 3.1.
This was altered in 3.2 to perform happy-eyeba
el lookups to and A records?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2013 10:54
An: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?
On 12/02/2013 8:41 p.m., Sandrini
On 12/02/2013 8:41 p.m., Sandrini Christian (xsnd) wrote:
Hi
I have now enabled ipv6
3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state
UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 00:50:56:a6:07:27 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 160.85.104.14/24 brd 160.85.104.255 scope global eth1
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fea
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2013 01:10
An: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?
On 12/02/2013 12:17 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> I gave you an option to install on the squid server a BIND cache
> server wasn't talking about you
On 12/02/2013 12:17 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
I gave you an option to install on the squid server a BIND cache
server wasn't talking about your main DNS server.
Note the you can always use a secondary dns instance to serve this
purpose to filter responses.
On 2/11/2013 2:48 PM, Sandr
I gave you an option to install on the squid server a BIND cache server
wasn't talking about your main DNS server.
Note the you can always use a secondary dns instance to serve this
purpose to filter responses.
On 2/11/2013 2:48 PM, Sandrini Christian (xsnd) wrote:
Hi
Thanks for your re
quid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?
My repo indeed.
I dont have full IPV6 stack here but IPV6 enabled due to the necessity.
It's kind of a global settings which seems to be working for almost anyone.
If you do ask me I would deal with it on the DNS level rather then squid.
Also take in acc
My repo indeed.
I dont have full IPV6 stack here but IPV6 enabled due to the necessity.
It's kind of a global settings which seems to be working for almost anyone.
If you do ask me I would deal with it on the DNS level rather then squid.
Also take in account that there are dns which has only
Centos 6.3
Source:
http://repo.ngtech.co.il/rpm/centos/6/x86_64/
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Eliezer Croitoru [mailto:elie...@ngtech.co.il]
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Februar 2013 12:38
An: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?
What
What distro?
On 2/11/2013 1:34 PM, Sandrini Christian (xsnd) wrote:
We only use RPM so I can not use the --disable-ipv6 parameter.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: babajaga [mailto:augustus_me...@yahoo.de]
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Februar 2013 11:56
An:squid-users@squid-cache.org
Betreff: [s
We only use RPM so I can not use the --disable-ipv6 parameter.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: babajaga [mailto:augustus_me...@yahoo.de]
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Februar 2013 11:56
An: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Betreff: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?
I am not using IPv6, too. S
14 matches
Mail list logo
