Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-24 Thread Henrik Nordström
mån 2008-02-18 klockan 12:57 + skrev Sven Edge: > In the 2.5 config, > httpd_accel_host virtual > and possibly also > httpd_accel_single_host off > httpd_accel_uses_host_header on > mean that web servers are chosen from our internal DNS, without needing > to be hardcoded as c

Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-21 Thread Amos Jeffries
Sven Edge wrote: From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sven Edge wrote: Poking around the source for the squid-2.6.STABLE17 release currently in Fedora, there's appears to be another source of DIRECT_NO besides a never_direct, in peer_select.c. http://www.squid-cache.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb

RE: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-20 Thread Sven Edge
>From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sven Edge wrote: >> >> Poking around the source for the squid-2.6.STABLE17 release >currently in >> Fedora, there's appears to be another source of DIRECT_NO besides a >> never_direct, in peer_select.c. >> http://www.squid-cache.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.

Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
Sven Edge wrote: From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sven Edge wrote: From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I think that's what I'm trying, and it fails to find a web server to talk to. Hmm, you can do a spot-check on squid with "squidclient mgr:ipcache | grep www.scran.a

RE: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-19 Thread Sven Edge
>From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sven Edge wrote: >>> From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> I think that's what I'm trying, and it fails to find a web server to >> talk to. > >Hmm, you can do a spot-check on squid with >"squidclient mgr:ipcache | grep www.scran.a

Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
Sven Edge wrote: From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a way to do this in 2.6? Yes, with a little trickery in DNS. You need to use DNS-views so that the public see squid as being an A/ for the domain and squid does not. If squid ever find itself as a source server for a

RE: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-19 Thread Sven Edge
>From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Is there a way to do this in 2.6? > >Yes, with a little trickery in DNS. You need to use DNS-views >so that the >public see squid as being an A/ for the domain and squid >does not. If >squid ever find itself as a source server for any of th

Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-18 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > Is there a way to do this in 2.6? > > Yes, with a little trickery in DNS. You need to use DNS-views so that the > public see squid as being an A/ for the domain and squid does not. If > squid ever find itself as a source server for any of the dom

Re: [squid-users] DNS-based reverse proxy peer selection, 2.5 vs 2.6

2008-02-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
> Hi there, > > I'm trying to upgrade our reverse proxy setup from 2.5 to 2.6, and > understand that the relevant config words have changed, but I'm not sure > how to emulate our current setup. > > In the 2.5 config, > httpd_accel_host virtual > and possibly also > httpd_accel_single_ho