So I have OWA and RPCoHTTPS accelerator working on 3.0, with forward
proxy on a separate instance of 2.6. Now I'm building a new Redhat box
and I would like to handle both my normal LAN proxy and reverse proxy
for OWA, RPCoHTTPS and Activesync on one instance of Squid. It sounded
like 2.6 should be
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hello gurus,
I have been trying the whole day to get Squid to work as a reverse
proxy/accelerator for OWA and RPC-over-https with no sucess. I believe
I've come to my /etc on this!
I have read the Wiki entries and this thread:
http://www.nabble.com/Forwarding-Denied-wh
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>>
>> Hello gurus,
>>
>> I have been trying the whole day to get Squid to work as a reverse
>> proxy/accelerator for OWA and RPC-over-https with no sucess. I believe
>> I've come to my /etc on this
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hello gurus,
I have been trying the whole day to get Squid to work as a reverse
proxy/accelerator for OWA and RPC-over-https with no sucess. I believe
I've come to my
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hello gurus,
I have been trying the whole day to get Squid t
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 11:09 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> it, especially because Outlook needs the https:// URI. However, as we
> are going to do the SSL offloading on the accelerator, I believe
> http:// would suffice.
It will, but you need to configure Squid cache_peer with the
front-end-h
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Henrik Nordstrom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On mån, 2008-06-02 at 11:09 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>> it, especially because Outlook needs the https:// URI. However, as we
>> are going to do the SSL offloading on the accelerator, I believe
>> http:// would
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 13:41 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> (actually, this is supposed to be the only entry for cache_peer I am
> goingto have?)
If you only have one server, and that server is only talking http then
yes there is only a single cache_peer..
> That has worked. It also requied
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Henrik Nordstrom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On mån, 2008-06-02 at 13:41 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>> (actually, this is supposed to be the only entry for cache_peer I am
>> goingto have?)
>
> If you only have one server, and that server is only talking http
iambo Washington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:41 AM
> To: Squid users
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to have squid as do Proxy and
> OWA/RPCoHTTPS accelerator?
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Henrik Nordstrom
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lan Lehman
-Original Message-
From: Odhiambo Washington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:41 AM
To: Squid users
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Is it possible to have squid as do Proxy and
OWA/RPCoHTTPS accelerator?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Henrik Nordstrom
<[EMA
Alan Lehman wrote:
>> My current config (which works for OWA, but not RPCoHTTP):
>>
>> extension_methods RPC_IN_DATA RPC_OUT_DATA
>>
>> https_port public_ip_for_owa:443
cert=/usr/share/ssl/owa/combined.crt key=/usr/share/ssl/owa/owa.key
defaultsite=owa.tld.com
>>
>> https_port public_
12 matches
Mail list logo
