Andrew Sawyers wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:14 PM
To: Andrew Sawyers
Cc: 'Henrik Nordstrom'; 'Askar'; 'Squid Users'
Subject: RE: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/DR
On Wed, 9
> -Original Message-
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:14 PM
> To: Andrew Sawyers
> Cc: 'Henrik Nordstrom'; 'Askar'; 'Squid Users'
> Subject: RE: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Any particular reason why you're after DR mode? I have several squids load
balanced in masq mode and we're able to handle more traffic then most sites
can aspire too - with basically 0 load on the LVS server.
If you do interception then LVS must not NAT th
echnology
Adelaide, SA, Australia
> Andrew
> --
> Zope Managed Hosting
> Systems Administrator/Software Engineer
> Zope Corporation
> (540) 361-1700
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 09,
ROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:11 AM
> To: Askar
> Cc: Squid Users
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/DR
>
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Askar wrote:
>
> > and yes all the caches are on the same switch, and we will also put the
> LVS
> > Director
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Askar wrote:
and yes all the caches are on the same switch, and we will also put the LVS
Director on the same switch with cache servers.
I thinks LVS/DR is what we have to go for ? :) sorry for my stupid question
again and again
Yes.
To make this setup simpler the LVS should h
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Askar wrote:
sorry my ignorance, I don't really have good idea abotu LVS/TUN or LVS/DR.
LVS/DR is generally preferrable over LVS/TUN as it doesn't require any
special support in the cache server OS (just a carefully planned network).
LVS/TUN requires a appropriate tunnel to b
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:49:40 +0100 (CET), Henrik Nordstrom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Askar wrote:
>
> > I am wondering if anyone here running "Virtual Server via IP Tunneling" or
> > "Virtual Server via Direct Routing", LVS based caches cluster.
>
Yep, I am currently
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Askar wrote:
I am wondering if anyone here running "Virtual Server via IP Tunneling" or
"Virtual Server via Direct Routing", LVS based caches cluster.
Not currently, but I have used LVS/DR and LVS/NAT in the past a lot to
load balance servers, including Squid proxy servers. N
