Re: [squid-users] Problem with cache poisoning

2004-01-29 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Hans-Christian Prytz wrote: > Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Exacly what traffic is in the dagbaldet_2702.dmp trace? This looks very > > odd and the originator of this connection (132.150.0.76:65361) seems to be > > completely lost. > > Exactly. For some

Re: [squid-users] Problem with cache poisoning

2004-01-20 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Hans-Christian Prytz wrote: > I'm trying to do this now, but I haven't been able to reproduce the > problem in a controlled environment so far. If you can I would be very interested in tcpdump captures including payload of the client and server traffic where this poisoning g

Re: [squid-users] Problem with cache poisoning

2004-01-20 Thread Hans-Christian Prytz
"Elsen Marc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > I never had this but I would suggest finding out whether you > are dealing with cache poisoning or perhaps 'browser poisoning' due > to cookie fiddling or whatever due to earlier visit of a malicious site. > This could easily be done by queryin

RE: [squid-users] Problem with cache poisoning

2004-01-19 Thread Elsen Marc
> > > Hi, I'm having the exact same problem that was discussed (briefly) on > this list back in December > (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg11 > 526.html) > except that I'm running on Solaris, and not Linux. > I can't find anything in the archives other than the first mail, and