RE: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP Issue with REQMOD 302

2010-04-14 Thread Niall O'Cuilinn
Hi Christos Thanks for the reply. Sorry that was my mistake, I removed some sensitive info from the location header URL but forgot to modify the null-body value. It should have read null-body=100 (I removed 60 chars/bytes). You might be right and it might still be out by two. I will have a

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP Issue with REQMOD 302

2010-04-14 Thread Niall O'Cuilinn
Hi, Just resending the correct request and response: ICAP Request from Squid: REQMOD icap://10.1.1.25:1344/reqmod ICAP/1.0\r\n Host: 10.1.1.25:1344\r\n Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:25:39 GMT\r\n Encapsulated: req-hdr=0, null-body=398\r\n Allow: 204\r\n \r\n GET http://c.proxy.com/www.test.com/

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP Issue with REQMOD 302

2010-04-14 Thread Niall O'Cuilinn
Hi I had a look at the null-body values. They correctly match the length of the HTTP 302 response headers block. The extra two bytes is an extra line return. You can see that after the last header there are three '\r\n' line returns. I tried removing one of them but the result was the same. I

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP Issue with REQMOD 302

2010-04-14 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:10:04 +0100, Niall O'Cuilinn nocuil...@amdocs.com wrote: Hi I had a look at the null-body values. They correctly match the length of the HTTP 302 response headers block. The extra two bytes is an extra line return. You can see that after the last header there are three

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP Issue with REQMOD 302

2010-04-13 Thread Christos Tsantilas
Niall O'Cuilinn wrote: Hi, I have recently moved from Squid 3.0 to Squid 3.1. I am trying to integrate it with an ICAP server. I am having a problem where Squid 3.1 is rejecting some responses from the ICAP server which Squid 3.0 accepted. The response in question is a REQMOD response