On Sat, Mar 22, 2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Squid-3 is different and uses a splay tree for the memory nodes of the
object, and should behave a lot better in this regard.
The bounds are probably saner but the runtime hit for small objects
is noticable.
The real solution is a tree for offset
Chris Woodfield wrote:
For our purposes (reverse proxy usage) we don't see any missing features
from squid 3 that we would need - however, we'd like to see the code
base mature some more before we trust it in production. Same reason that
smart folks don't deploy new Cisco IOS trains until it
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 20:14 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/squid-users@squid-cache.org/msg52509.html
Hmm, not sure exactly what Adrian as planned there, beyond changing the
underlying malloc/calloc system of squid to something else.
Added it to the 'undocumented
For our purposes (reverse proxy usage) we don't see any missing
features from squid 3 that we would need - however, we'd like to see
the code base mature some more before we trust it in production. Same
reason that smart folks don't deploy new Cisco IOS trains until it
hits the 3rd or 4th
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 10:18 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
At the end of the day, I'd rather see something that an increasing number of
people
on the Internet will use and - I won't lie here - whatever creates a self
sustaining
project, both from community and financial perspectives.
I agree
, 2008 9:25 PM
To: Adrian Chadd
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Future (was Re: [squid-users] Squid-2,
Squid-3, roadmap)
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 10:18 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
At the end of the day, I'd rather see something that an increasing
number of people
My 2c WRT 2 v 3 etc;
- We currently run commercial proxies and are looking to replace them with
squid boxes, however recent list discussion is making me a little nervous. I
would have used 2.6 for performance (need to support 10K users) and for
- Secure Computing's Smartfilter. It currently
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008, Nick Duda wrote:
The only reason I haven't upgraded beyond the current stable 2.6 code is that
some third part companies (like Secure Computing, who we use as a Squid
plugin) only supports certain versions of squid. I haven't even played with
3.0 because of this. I
