: Re: [squid-users] Squid in the Enterpise
To: Adam Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org squid-users@squid-cache.org
Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 8:33 PM
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Adam Carter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our planned deployment box is a 8-way, 16GB
ram, 1TB
I agree. But we have infrastructure problems that really push
hard to make it a single ip. We'll be doing WCCP and standard
proxy. But a large number of the clients have hardcoded proxy
ips and make it prohibitive to change it to a new address.
So you have two options:
- setup this hardcoded
Good points. I was thinking the same thing.
By Open Source fear I meant that fear of using something now blessed by a major
company you can read about on CNN Money.
R
--- On Thu, 7/17/08, Rhino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Rhino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid
: Adam Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid in the Enterpise
To: ML squid squid-users@squid-cache.org
Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 8:11 PM
you should bear in mind that for a cache to be truly
effective at
bandwidth conservation (if that is your goal) it
needs to be placed
horizontally across the
network, but I have what I have.
R
--- On Thu, 7/17/08, jason bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: jason bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid in the Enterpise
To: Adam Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org squid-users@squid-cache.org
about.
R
--- On Thu, 7/17/08, Adam Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Adam Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid in the Enterpise
To: ML squid squid-users@squid-cache.org
Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 8:11 PM
you should bear in mind that for a cache to be truly
Brie. Thanks. I'll keep searching.
R
I read the other day that Wikipedia has a 70 Squid server setup.
I can't find the original article.
See:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/43868/Wikipedia-site-internals-workbook-2007
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/200701/0075.html
Regards,
On fre, 2008-07-18 at 08:14 -0400, Brie Gordon wrote:
I read the other day that Wikipedia has a 70 Squid server setup.
It's a fairly large Squid setup indeed. Not sure about the exact number
of servers they have today but a lot of interesting details can be found
from the following Wikimedia
--- On Thu, 7/17/08, Robert V. Coward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Robert V. Coward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] Squid in the Enterpise
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 11:51 AM
I am running into the standard Open Source fear
at my local site. Can
Robert V. Coward escreveu:
I am running into the standard Open Source fear at my local site. Can anyone
name some major companies that use Squid. We are talking enterprise or ISP here. We
currently have about 100,000 users with heavy streaming video use. Some of the management
are afraid
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
Robert V. Coward escreveu:
I am running into the standard Open Source fear at my local site.
Can anyone name some major companies that use Squid. We are talking
enterprise or ISP here. We currently have about 100,000 users with
heavy streaming video use.
I am running into the standard Open Source fear at my local
site.
Ask the fearmongers if they've ever heard of a little piece of software called
BIND, or maybe Apache... Also, you should probably get pricing on commercial
squid support, to let management know that it can be had and how much
you should bear in mind that for a cache to be truly effective at
bandwidth conservation (if that is your goal) it
needs to be placed close to the users.
Maybe - it depends if you want to save bandwidth on your LAN or WAN/Internet
pipe. AFAIK most organisations are more concerned about WAN
Our planned deployment box is a 8-way, 16GB ram, 1TB (6 disks
I think) server which will be running RedHat Enterprise Linux.
There's been some recent list discussions about how squid uses CPU - you'd be
much better off with 4 load balanced dual core boxes than one 8 core box. RAM
is cheap
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Adam Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our planned deployment box is a 8-way, 16GB ram, 1TB (6 disks
I think) server which will be running RedHat Enterprise Linux.
There's been some recent list discussions about how squid uses CPU - you'd be
much better off
15 matches
Mail list logo
