Re: [squid-users] Squid on steroids

2008-06-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On ons, 2008-06-18 at 01:44 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm most interested in the squid back-end setup. Should we look at something linux based clustering? Or should we be looking at some internal squid process? You don't need to cluster Squif, just a bunch of more or less independent

Re: [squid-users] Squid on steroids

2008-06-18 Thread Chris Robertson
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On ons, 2008-06-18 at 01:44 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm most interested in the squid back-end setup. Should we look at something linux based clustering? Or should we be looking at some internal squid process? You don't need to cluster Squif, just a

Re: [squid-users] Squid on steroids

2008-06-18 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Just consider balancing the load on source IP, or NATing the Squid servers, as there are a number of websites that don't like a single HTTP session originating from multiple IPs. Long ago, far away, when I owned a managed server hosting company... We used Foundry load balancers to

Re: [squid-users] Squid on steroids

2008-06-17 Thread Mark Nottingham
What's your workload? E.g., is it going to be used as a proxy farm for dialup users? Broadband? If so, how many? Or, is it for an accelerator, and if so, how much content is there? Cheers, On 18/06/2008, at 5:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been given a directive to build a squid

Re: [squid-users] Squid on steroids

2008-06-17 Thread ffredrixson
More broadband connections than anything else. Possibly as many as 50,000 users. No accelerator, maybe not even caching. Mostly to filter downloads, record websites, etc. maybe with something like urldb or Dansguardian. Do you have ideas??? Thank you. -- Original message

Re: [squid-users] Squid on steroids

2008-06-17 Thread Mark Nottingham
If you're not caching at all and using reasonably modern hardware (e.g., dual core, ~3Ghz), you should be able to get somewhere between 2,000 and 4,000 requests a second out of a single squid process, depending on the average response size. YMMV, of course, and that doesn't count the

RE: [squid-users] Squid on steroids

2008-06-17 Thread Adam Carter
The hard part is going to be directing requests to the proxies, and handling failure well. I haven't done ISP proxy deployments in a long time, so I'll leave it to others to give you advice on that part. I'm assuming you'll want it to be transparent (e.g., use WCCP)? If transparent, WCCPv2

Re: [squid-users] Squid on steroids

2008-06-17 Thread ffredrixson
50,000 customers total. We're looking at LVS using keepalived for load balancing at the front-end. I'm most interested in the squid back-end setup. Should we look at something linux based clustering? Or should we be looking at some internal squid process? Could we run multiple squid processes