On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
Am I better of with samba 2 or 3?
Defenitely Samba-3. Samba-2 is considered end-of-life by the Samba
developers and no longer maintained, not even security fixes.
Regards
Henrik
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 13:44 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
Am I better of with samba 2 or 3?
Defenitely Samba-3. Samba-2 is considered end-of-life by the Samba
developers and no longer maintained, not even security fixes.
Thanks Henrik, I
Take a look at: http://mkeadle.org/index.php?p=13 and
http://web.irtnog.org/howtos/freebsd/winbind.
Brian E. Conklin, MCP+I, MCSE
Director of Information Services
Mason General Hospital
PO Box 1668, Shelton, WA 98584
voice: 360-427-3423
fax: 360-427-9599
http://www.masongeneral.com
