RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-11-06 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Manu C S wrote: > acl porn dstdom_regex -i "/etc/squid/porn1" > > where the file "/etc/squid/porn1" > had lines of the form > .xxx.com These SHOULD be a dstdom acl, not a dstdom_regex. > Based on Adam Aube's suggestion about literal dots in regex, > I changed that to: >

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-11-05 Thread Manu C S
Hi all, Just thought I'd close this thread. I installed squid 2.5 with dlmalloc and found that I could use MSN messenger but the speed improved only slightly. My proxy was checking for a list of pornographic sites (4000+ in all) and the format I was using was acl porn dstdom_regex -i "/etc/squid

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-31 Thread Adam Aube
>> Insert a rule allowing IM access before you require authentication in >> http_access. > > What would that look like in a squid.conf file? > Right now, I have the following order of acl operator lines: Your http_access list looks fine. The only reason you should be seeing a login prompt for IM i

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-31 Thread Manu C S
Hi, >Insert a rule allowing IM access before you require authentication in >http_access. What would that look like in a squid.conf file? Right now, I have the following order of acl operator lines: -- acl student proxy_auth REQUIRED # allo

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-30 Thread Adam Aube
> I am able to successfully use MSN messenger with the new > proxy. But I still have the same problem with yahoo > messenger. > I was just wondering: MSN allows you to specify > user-authentication (user/password/realm) in its sign-in > options whereas yahoo doesn't. > Do you think that could be

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-30 Thread Manu C S
Hi Adam, Like I mentioned yesterday I got my squid 2.5 running on IPCop. Took awhile to figure out the new configuration and I finally got it up & running. Thanks so very much for all your inputs. Couldn't have done it without them. I found that with the new Squid, I have partial success with reg

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-29 Thread Manu C S
>Since there are some new features in Squid 2.5 Stable4 >where can i get a copy of the squid.conf.default? >There wasn't a copy in the source I downloaded and >I'd like examples of how to use some of the new tags. Oops! Shot off that email before I dug around. I found the default configuration fil

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-29 Thread Adam Aube
> I built it on RH7.3 and I'm able to use the executable > on IPCop. Thanks for the suggestion. You're welcome - I'm glad you could get everything working. > Since there are some new features in Squid 2.5 Stable4 > where can i get a copy of the squid.conf.default? > There wasn't a copy in the sou

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-29 Thread Manu C S
Hi, >RedHat 8.0 uses glibc 2.3, so when you compile Squid on it, Squid gets >linked with glibc 2.3. Do you have access to a Linux box that has an >older version of glibc? If so, try building Squid on that. I built it on RH7.3 and I'm able to use the executable on IPCop. Thanks for the suggestion.

Re: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-28 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Manu C S wrote: > Yes, I am building it from source. > I'm building it on RH8.0 because IPCop doesn't have a compiler. > After building it, when I check the symbols in the squid > executable using nm, I get: >$nm squid | grep GLIBC_2.3 > U __ctype_b_loc@@GLIBC_2.3 >

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-28 Thread Adam Aube
>>> Well, I downloaded squid 2.5 stable 4 and built it. >>> Unfortunately I cannot run that on IPCop 1.3 because >>> squid 2.5 uses glibc 2.3 that is not supported in IPCop. >> Strange - we're running RedHat 7.3 (which has glibc 2.2.5) >> and had no problems building Squid. You're building Squid >

Re: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-28 Thread Manu C S
>It's better to ask the list than just one person - you get more replies that >way. Additionally, anyone who has the same question in the future benefits >from having the answer already in the archives. Yes, sir. >> Well, I downloaded squid 2.5 stable 4 and built it. >> Unfortunately I cannot r

Re: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-27 Thread Adam Aube
On Monday 27 October 2003 08:16 pm, Manu C S wrote: > Sorry to barge in on you like this. It's better to ask the list than just one person - you get more replies that way. Additionally, anyone who has the same question in the future benefits from having the answer already in the archives. > Y

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-24 Thread Adam Aube
>> I noticed that you specify a proxy_auth acl, but don't show the >> http_access line that utilizes it. You haven't shown us all your acl >> and http_access lines; please post your entire squid.conf (please >> remove any blank lines or comments first). > Thanks for the response. > Here's my entir

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-22 Thread Manu C S
Hi Adam, >I noticed that you specify a proxy_auth acl, but don't show the >http_access line that utilizes it. You haven't shown us all your acl >and http_access lines; please post your entire squid.conf (please >remove any blank lines or comments first). Thanks for the response. Here's my entire

RE: [squid-users] time based Instant Message blocking

2003-10-22 Thread Adam Aube
> I need to provide time-based access to > yahoo & msn messengers in my college lab. > The restriction is only for students. > Staff & Admins have unrestricted access to IM services. > My rules are like this: [rules snipped] I noticed that you specify a proxy_auth acl, but don't show the http_a