-users] Objects Release from Cache Earlier Than Expected
The web server is IIS 6.
1) Would there be any reason why it would return the full object when in fact
the object has not been modified?
2) If the min age guarantees freshness of the object, why would Squid actually
issue and IMS request
On ons, 2008-10-22 at 14:35 -0700, BUI18 wrote:
Object is initially cached. Max age in squid.conf is set to 1 min.
Before 1 min passes, I request the object and Squid returns TCP_HIT.
After 1 min, I try to request for object again. Squid returns
TCP_REFRESH_HIT, which is what I expect. I
Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BUI18 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 4:06:33 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Objects Release from Cache Earlier Than Expected
On ons, 2008-10-22 at 14:35 -0700, BUI18 wrote:
Object is initially cached. Max age
PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Objects Release from Cache Earlier Than Expected
On ons, 2008-10-22 at 14:35 -0700, BUI18 wrote:
Object is initially cached. Max age in squid.conf is set to 1 min.
Before 1 min passes, I request the object and Squid returns TCP_HIT.
After 1 min, I try
PROTECTED]
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 7:19:51 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Objects Release from Cache Earlier Than Expected
I am talking about If-Modified-Since between Squid and the web server,
not browser-squid.
On ons, 2008-10-22 at 17:57 -0700, BUI18 wrote
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 17:45 -0700, BUI18 wrote:
I not sure what you mean by a newer copy of the same URL? Can you elaborate
on that a bit?
The cache (i.e. Squid) performed a conditional request to the origin web
server, and the web server returned a new 200 OK object with full
content instead
?
Regards
-bui
- Original Message
From: Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BUI18 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 3:50:20 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Objects Release from Cache Earlier Than Expected
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 17:45 -0700
Hi -
Here's some additional info I noticed from the store.log.
1224524455.351
SWAPOUT 00 0003A6CB 7377CBD1A7584A5D7C7FD06B5B827595 200 1224524431
1224522501-1 video/jpeg 1337100/1337100 GET
http://ftp.mydomain.com/myserver/websites/data/MyVideoFile1020130441180.vid
1224544851.517
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 16:02 -0700, BUI18 wrote:
Hi -
I have been trying to track down an issue with Squid 2.6 STABLE18 and
why users were getting TCP_REFRESH_MISS instead of TCP_REFRESH_HIT on
files that were recently cached. We first noticed that users were
getting misses when we expected
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BUI18 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 4:55:41 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Objects Release from Cache Earlier Than Expected
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 16:02 -0700, BUI18 wrote:
Hi -
I have been trying to track down an issue
10 matches
Mail list logo
