Every now and then when I 'delete & next' I get the below message. Is
this a IMAP/server, squirrelmail or what?
Subject: View Full Header
View Printable Version
From:
Date: Wed, December 31, 1969 7:00 pm
To:
Priority: Normal
Body retrieval error. The reason for this is most probably that the
m
I too see a hang when I click on a folder name. The server error log
shows a dead loop of messages like:
sh: \\\netlogon: command not found
sh: \\\Temp: command not found
sh: \\\recvq: command not found
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Lilla wrote:
> > The machine running RH7.3 (and the SSL
> > hole) now has port 443 blocked at the router so I can use SM on the LAN,
> > but use pine over SSH from the outside world (where I am now).
> > Are others generally running SM over SSL?
>
> At my place we _only_ a
Rumor has it that Jon Reynolds said:
>Thanks for the reply. What I needed to do was use my real IP
> address
> in imapd instead of the loopback address and all is well. I did get
> the answer from the qmail list from someone running the same setup
> as I. You were right that I had the loop
> The machine running RH7.3 (and the SSL
> hole) now has port 443 blocked at the router so I can use SM on the LAN,
> but use pine over SSH from the outside world (where I am now).
> Are others generally running SM over SSL?
At my place we _only_ accept SM over SSL, no HTTP. I'm also running
Rick Castello said:
> William E. Kempf said:
>
>> I don't understand the opposition to either suggestion, especially
>> from the lead architect here. Marking an entire folder as read, or
>> even deleting it's contents, is not something that unusual for users
>> to do. It may be that I'm a bit on
Could you make an option for how to handle the original message when
replying? What I am referring to is right now when I hit reply it prefixes
every line with a '>'. I (and I'm sure many others) hate that. I like what
it does when you forward a message; It puts that "---Original Message---"
Keith Pettit zei:
> This is the coolest idea for a pluggin I've seen, it rocks!!
100% agreed :-)
I just adapted it to run on SM 1.3.2 devel.
The only thing I didn't get to manage in a short time was uploading files.
When I have some time left I probably can contribute to this plugin and add
so
I was wondering if you could designate a section on your plugins page for
plugins that don't require any linux functions? Or maybe just list the ones
that are compatible with windows machines (PHP-Only plugins)?
For us Windows users, It's annoying to have to download a plugin, install &
config
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 10:28, Caleb Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 12:10, Jon Reynolds wrote:
> > I am having this problem with relaying using squirrelmail. When a user
> > is on the local network they can send email to a remote host with no
> > problem. When the same user is at their h
U need to make sure your sendmail is running:
telnet localhost 25
If you are using sm on the same box as the smtp server is running, you
should keep it as 127.0.0.1 or localhost
By default redhat like to make sendmail only accessible by 127.0.0.1
-J
> Hello, I'm new to this mailing list.
>
> I
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 12:10, Jon Reynolds wrote:
> I am having this problem with relaying using squirrelmail. When a user
> is on the local network they can send email to a remote host with no
> problem. When the same user is at their house which uses a different IP
> address that isn't in my
Hello, I'm new to this mailing list.
I installed squirrelmail rpm package for redhat 8.0,
everything runs good, but the sendmail.
I use a SMTP sever other than localhost,
when I send email from squirrelmail,
the SMTP server gives an error message,
---
mail.server sendmail[6674]: NOQUEUE: Null con
This is the coolest idea for a pluggin I've seen, it rocks!!
Anyways it got it install, it lists the shares on the server I specified
but it seems to lock up the server running squirrlmail. I'm running
version 1.2.9, and smb 2.2.5. Any usage tips?
Keith
--
I am having this problem with relaying using squirrelmail. When a user
is on the local network they can send email to a remote host with no
problem. When the same user is at their house which uses a different IP
address that isn't in my rcpt file they get a "relaying denied" message.
Squirr
> Are others generally running SM over SSL?
I do for my "production" copy of SquirrelMail. For my CVS copy, which
only I use for testing, I don't bother. I'm using a "demo" SSL cert which
is only good for 6 months, but once it expires I'll just go self-signed, I
think.
--
Chris Hilts
[EM
William E. Kempf said:
> I don't understand the opposition to either suggestion, especially from
> the lead architect here. Marking an entire folder as read, or even
> deleting it's contents, is not something that unusual for users to do.
> It may be that I'm a bit on the fringe with the volume o
Of course, everything between the client and SM is encrypted by
SSL, but I don't think the stuff between SM and IMAP is. And the original
writer wanted to keep unencrypted stuff off the LAN between SM and the
IMAP server. I'm running SM and IMAP server on the same machine, so this
is not an
p dont think said:
> I think it should work for you.
> Let's see the most important setting you need is:
>
> $dontUseHostName = 1;
>
> and maybe (but not necessarily):
>
> $smHostIsDomainThatUserLoggedInWith = 1;
>
> Then in the $virtualDomains array, just make sure that 'org_name' is set
> co
Not true at all, all CLIENT communication is encrypted, but comms within
your own environment between the web server and the IMAP server are still
plain text.
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Sabini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hello Ben,
On Thursday, October 31, 2002, Ben Sabini wrote...
> By pushing SM to https, wouldnt that will do the trick ?
> I mean once you are on https, everything is encrpted.
Unfortunately no... this will only encrypt the traffic between the end
user and the SM code itself... not between the SM
> By pushing SM to https, wouldnt that will do the trick ?
> I mean once you are on https, everything is encrpted.
That will encrypt communication between the web browser and the web
server. It will still leave the password sent from the web server to the
imap server unprotected.
[users's browse
By pushing SM to https, wouldnt that will do the trick ?
I mean once you are on https, everything is encrpted.
--- Chris Hilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My IMAP-server is not on the same box as SM is running. To avoid
> sending
> > cleartext passwords over my LAN is it possible to configure S
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:45:19PM -0800, John Locke wrote:
>> Ah, but William stated above that Show All timed out ...
>>
>> I think the real issue here is not Squirrelmail, but your IMAP server.
>> Let me guess... you're using UW-IMAP.
>>
>> I was having similar trouble with some of my folders
Hi all:
I'm using SM1.28 and created some subfolders under the Send folder.
It's work find.
When I try to use the new release SM1.29, I found the subfolder
of the Send that was creatd in SM1.28 can't dispaly correctly. Those
subfolder will displayed another Folder That I create by myself.
I try
This is a problem I've noticed with the STABLE and DEVEL series. It only
seems to happen when the filters plugin is activated. I've submitted a
bug report for it, but I don't know what needs to be fixed.
Seth.
Marco Borrini said:
>
> Seth E. Randall disse:
>> Does it happen in all mailboxes, or
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:45:19PM -0800, John Locke wrote:
> Ah, but William stated above that Show All timed out ...
>
> I think the real issue here is not Squirrelmail, but your IMAP server. Let
> me guess... you're using UW-IMAP.
>
> I was having similar trouble with some of my folders. Switc
John Locke said:
> Rick Castello said:
>> William E. Kempf said:
>>> Here's two features I'd like, and I was wondering if there were any
>>> plugins that currently do this.
>>>
>>> 1) Ability to mark all the messages in a folder as read. A bit
>>> unusual, but I have a backup folder that often ge
> My IMAP-server is not on the same box as SM is running. To avoid sending
> cleartext passwords over my LAN is it possible to configure SM to use
> IMAP/SSL instead? (I'm runninge Courier-IMAP 1.5.3 with OpenSSL 0.9.6g)
I'm working on support for this right now. Unfortunately, it requires PHP
4.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
HI, i'm trying to use the ldap change password plugin...but
it dowsn't seems to work ok with me:
if i enter only the old password (the correct one) it tells me that
the you must fill in the boxes new pass and retype new pass. it's
obvious..if i enter a
Seth E. Randall disse:
> Does it happen in all mailboxes, or just the INBOX?
>
> Seth.
It's very strange:
a) if the first action is entering INBOX, i see no links on Prevoius/Next
links and no "Delete&Prev" plugin, then i check Trash and... everything
seems to works again!
b) if my first action i
31 matches
Mail list logo
