Re: [SM-USERS] Re: php accelerators

2005-04-09 Thread David Rees
On Apr 8, 2005 4:39 PM, Daniel Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Lesneiwski wrote: > > I just came across what looks to be the most promising alternative so > > far: http://eaccelerator.net/HomeUk This appears to be a MMCache > > extension under current development, except it gives me the

Re: [SM-USERS] LDAP mailhost routing and squirrelmail

2005-04-09 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
anthony wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If it wasn't for squirrelmail I would push my LDAP mailhost routing change through this w/e. Does anyone know if any of the plugins use LDAP to get IMAP server info based on the username? The closest thing I have see is the vlogin plugi

[SM-USERS] LDAP mailhost routing and squirrelmail

2005-04-09 Thread anthony
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If it wasn't for squirrelmail I would push my LDAP mailhost routing change through this w/e. Does anyone know if any of the plugins use LDAP to get IMAP server info based on the username? The closest thing I have see is the vlogin plugin that uses re

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authenticationhelp?

2005-04-09 Thread Jonathan Angliss
>> I have been trying to get Squirrelmail working with Courier-Imap >> and have hit a wall. If I manually test access to the imap server >> with a, >> >> telnet myimapserver 143 >> a001 LOGIN username password >> >> (everything works just fine.) >> >> H

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authenticationhelp?

2005-04-09 Thread p dont think
Please reply *on list* so others can benefit. I have been trying to get Squirrelmail working with Courier-Imap and have hit a wall. If I manually test access to the imap server with a, telnet myimapserver 143 a001 LOGIN username password (everything works just fine.) However when I try the same

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authenticationhelp?

2005-04-09 Thread me lmiddle
- Original Message - From: "Tony Earnshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authenticationhelp? Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 00:00:36 +0200 > > lør, 09.04.2005 kl. 21.23 skrev me lmiddle: > > > I

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authentication help?

2005-04-09 Thread p dont think
I have been trying to get Squirrelmail working with Courier-Imap and have hit a wall. If I manually test access to the imap server with a, telnet myimapserver 143 a001 LOGIN username password (everything works just fine.) However when I try the same thing with Squirrelmail 1.4.4 I get a error o

RE: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authentication help?

2005-04-09 Thread Tony Earnshaw
lør, 09.04.2005 kl. 22.36 skrev Marc Powell: [...] > Try enabling debug in courier. It'll log the username and password > that's passed to it. I'll bet that will point you to what you've > misconfigured. This only applies to the very latest (6 months?) Courier IMAP c.q. Courier authlib libraries

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authentication help?

2005-04-09 Thread Tony Earnshaw
lør, 09.04.2005 kl. 21.23 skrev me lmiddle: > I have been trying to get Squirrelmail What SquirrelMail? > working with Courier-Imap What Courier IMAP? > and > have hit a wall. If I manually test access to the imap server with a, > > telnet myimapserver 143 > a001 LOGIN username passwo

RE: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authentication help?

2005-04-09 Thread me lmiddle
- Original Message - From: "Marc Powell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authentication help? Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:36:14 -0500 > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authentication help?

2005-04-09 Thread Marc Powell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:squirrelmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of me lmiddle > Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 2:24 PM > To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authentication > help? > > He

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authentication help?

2005-04-09 Thread Paul Lesneiwski
I have been trying to get Squirrelmail working with Courier-Imap and have hit a wall. If I manually test access to the imap server with a, telnet myimapserver 143 a001 LOGIN username password (everything works just fine.) However when I try the same thing with Squirrelmail 1.4.4 I get a erro

[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail 1.4.4 and Courier-Imap authentication help?

2005-04-09 Thread me lmiddle
Hello, I have been trying to get Squirrelmail working with Courier-Imap and have hit a wall. If I manually test access to the imap server with a, telnet myimapserver 143 a001 LOGIN username password (everything works just fine.) However when I try the same thing with Squirrelmail 1.4.4 I g

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Could not create Hash directory (linux + apache this time)

2005-04-09 Thread p dont think
Daniel Watts wrote: Jonathan Angliss wrote: Hello Daniel, On Friday, April 08, 2005, Daniel Watts wrote... I know this was brought up for an IIS user but I'm having the problem with apache. Sqm: 1.4.4 PHP 4.3.10 Apache 2.0 Error: Error creating directory /home/virtua

Re: [SM-USERS] SuSE POP & IMAP

2005-04-09 Thread Dirk Enrique Seiffert
El Vie 08 Abr 2005 18:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > G'Day > > With a vanilla install of SuSE (9.0, 9.1, 9.2) SquirrelMail does not > work. The reason is that they have configured pop/imap to not allow > plain-text passwords. > > I fixed the problem by grabbing the imap source rpm from RedHat 9,

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Could not create Hash directory (linux + apache this time)

2005-04-09 Thread Daniel Watts
Jonathan Angliss wrote: Hello Daniel, On Friday, April 08, 2005, Daniel Watts wrote... I know this was brought up for an IIS user but I'm having the problem with apache. Sqm: 1.4.4 PHP 4.3.10 Apache 2.0 Error: Error creating directory /home/virtual/domain.com/var/ww

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug Report

2005-04-09 Thread Tony Earnshaw
lør, 09.04.2005 kl. 09.08 skrev p dont think: > >>People who attempt to help themselves are much more valuable and worthy > >>of helpful answers than leeches who expect it all handed to them. > > > > > > Good sig ;) And worthy of all men to receive ... > > are the women exempt? ;) Look at the

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug Report

2005-04-09 Thread p dont think
(B (BTony Earnshaw wrote: (B> fre, 08.04.2005 kl. 17.12 skrev Marc Powell: (B> (B> [...] (B> (B> (B>>People who attempt to help themselves are much more valuable and worthy (B>>of helpful answers than leeches who expect it all handed to them. (B> (B> (B> Good sig ;) And worthy of