On Thu, November 29, 2012 11:07 am, WJCarpenter wrote:
> I offer both on my server. (I also offer a 3rd which seems a little
> better for mobile users.)
what is the mobile friendly one ?
--
Voytek
--
Keep yourself c
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:11:24PM +0100, francwal...@gmx.net wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> This is a real pitty.
>
> For years I used Squirrelmail, but now, when I introduced Roundcube
> to my users, they immediately wanted to switch.
>
> It is done, roundcube is our new webmailer.
>
> Good bye, Squ
On 11/28/2012 04:11 AM, francwal...@gmx.net wrote:
> For years I used Squirrelmail, but now, when I introduced Roundcube to my
> users, they immediately wanted to switch.
> It is done, roundcube is our new webmailer.
I offer both on my server. (I also offer a 3rd which seems a little
better for
Thank you.
This is a real pitty.
For years I used Squirrelmail, but now, when I introduced Roundcube to my
users, they immediately wanted to switch.
It is done, roundcube is our new webmailer.
Good bye, Squirrelmail, it was a nice time after all :)
frank
Am 28.11.2012 um 11:21 schrieb Fredrik
On 28-11-2012 10:21, Fredrik Jervfors wrote:
>
> Roundcube certainly is eye pleasing (I've seen screenshots). I
> haven't
> used it or looked at the code, so I can't compare it to SquirrelMail
> function-wise.
>
Quite simply, Roundcube rocks...
It is unfortunate, but I have not seen any significa
> since some years I have SquirrelMail in use on my servers for my
> customers and me. At the moment I am running the “newest” version 1.4.22
> from 15. July 2011.
>
> I wonder why the design and the functions are so “old-school” like.
> It looks like Web 1.0 or before, but I miss some stylish new
