Re: [SM-USERS] Not all HTML messages display properly after FC5 upgrade

2006-03-29 Thread David Rees
On 3/29/06, Tomas Kuliavas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SquirrelMail does not parse message structure. It gets structure from IMAP > server. > > from dovecot src/lib-imap/imap-bodystructure.c > > /* If there was no Mime-Version, forget all the Content-stuff */ Thanks. The interesting part is that

Re: [SM-USERS] Not all HTML messages display properly after FC5 upgrade

2006-03-29 Thread David Rees
On 3/28/06, Tomas Kuliavas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think, during upgrade from FC4 to FC5 you have upgraded IMAP server. New > IMAP server version does not tolerate this RFC violation. Yes, that's correct, the IMAP server was upgraded from Dovecot 0.99.14 to 1.0-beta2. How does the IMAP serv

Re: [SM-USERS] Not all HTML messages display properly after FC5 upgrade

2006-03-28 Thread David Rees
On 3/28/06, Tomas Kuliavas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Using configtest.php the difference that I see is that now gettext is > > available on the FC5 system, it wasn't on the FC4 system. Any ideas on > > what the problem is? > > Do you have MIME-Version header in those text/html only emails? No

[SM-USERS] Not all HTML messages display properly after FC5 upgrade

2006-03-28 Thread David Rees
I had been running squirrelmail installed from 1.4.6 tarball on FC4 for some time without any problems. I upgraded to FC5 yesterday and now I notice that some HTML messages that I receive are no longer rendered properly. The message is a text/html message but the message is displayed as plain/text

Re: [SM-USERS] Problems with SM sessions via a proxy server?

2005-08-03 Thread David Rees
On 7/30/05, Rafael Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 17:23 -0700, David Rees wrote: > > On 7/29/05, Rafael Martinez Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > We already run SM under https/SSL all the way, all the time and t

Re: [SM-USERS] Problems with SM sessions via a proxy server?

2005-07-29 Thread David Rees
On 7/29/05, Rafael Martinez Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We already run SM under https/SSL all the way, all the time and the web > server sets these headers: > > *Cache-Control:no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, > pre-check=0CRLF > *Pragma:no-cache > > More ideas anyo

Re: [SM-USERS] Problems with SM sessions via a proxy server?

2005-07-28 Thread David Rees
On 7/28/05, Rafael Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The only explanation I can find to our problem is that the same happens > when using SM via a 'proxy' or that 'this' proxy in particular is not > working as it should. > > Anyone with the same problem or ideas to fix this serious securi

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: php accelerators

2005-04-09 Thread David Rees
On Apr 8, 2005 4:39 PM, Daniel Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Lesneiwski wrote: > > I just came across what looks to be the most promising alternative so > > far: http://eaccelerator.net/HomeUk This appears to be a MMCache > > extension under current development, except it gives me the

Re: [SM-USERS] Can't open mail

2005-04-06 Thread David Rees
On Apr 4, 2005 6:02 AM, Stuker Lucien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We use Squirrelmail from nutsmail. > Now we have the problem that some of the mail can't be open with > squirrelmail. > With the Internet Explorer displays the message "Site not found". Tell nutsmail.com admins to upgrade PHP

Re: [SM-USERS] HTML_mail

2005-04-05 Thread David Rees
On Apr 5, 2005 4:55 PM, Patrick Donker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reading this question, all I can do is ask myself how many times this > has been posted during the last week > Doesnt anybody check the archives then? Hah good luck. It's a battle getting people to search before posting at al

Re: [SM-USERS] PHP errors viewing attached emails

2005-03-31 Thread David Rees
On Tue, February 1, 2005 12:46 am, David Rees said: > First off, this appears to be a problem that others have experienced > before: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3384077&forum_id=2995 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.devel/5217 &

Re: [SM-USERS] Cannot download/view attachments

2005-03-11 Thread David Rees
Viren Patel wrote, On 3/10/2005 10:08 AM: Hello. We have the following mail server setup: Squirrelmail 1.4.4 PHP 4.3.10 Apache 2.0.52 Postfix 2.1.5 Dovecot 0.99.13 FreeBSD 5.3 We have a strange problem with viewing/downloading attachments that are sent from a Mac OS X 10.3.8 machi

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: PHP errors viewing attached emails

2005-02-28 Thread David Rees
On Wed, February 23, 2005 7:58 pm, Jonathan Angliss said: >>> > dovecot-0.99.13-3.FC3 >>> > PHP 4.3.10 (self compiled with '--with-mysql --with-pgsql >>> --with-gettext >> PHP Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /squirrelmail-1.4.4/class/mime/Message.class.php on li

Re: [SM-USERS] PHP errors viewing attached emails

2005-02-02 Thread David Rees
Well, I tried recompiling PHP without gettext support and I still get the same error. Anyone have any ideas on anything else I could try? Thanks, Dave On Tue, February 1, 2005 12:46 am, David Rees said: > First off, this appears to be a problem that others have experienced > before: &g

[SM-USERS] PHP errors viewing attached emails

2005-02-01 Thread David Rees
First off, this appears to be a problem that others have experienced before: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3384077&forum_id=2995 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.devel/5217 But no solutions posted in any threads I found besides "check the SM requirements".

Re: [SM-USERS] Web server hangs - 1.4.2 with Turck mmcache

2003-10-25 Thread David Rees
Paul Haldane wrote: We're using Squirrelmail 1.4.2 on Red Hat 8.0 with Apache 2.0.40 (from the Red Hat httpd-2.0.40-11.7 rpm), PHP 4.2.2 (again from Red Hat rpm) and Turck Mmcache 2.4.3 (built from source). We need to use mmcache to handle the load (we tried without it at the start of term and

[SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] FW: SecurityFocus Linux Newsletter #137 - Squirrelmail issues

2003-06-23 Thread David Rees
Marc Groot Koerkamp said: >> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7952 > > Ok I inpected the exploit and in SM 1.4 the exploit isn't there. I don't > have SM 1.2.x anymore so i didn't check the older versions. > > The exploit had to do with setting move_messages GET vars. Current > Squirrelmail versio

Re: [SM-USERS] Massive memory usage by SquirrelMail - Is this normal?

2003-04-02 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:45:08PM -0600, Kenneth D. Johnson wrote: > I am running RH7.3, Courier-IMAP, SM, vpopmail with server-side threading > enabled. My memory usage is out of site. On a box with 1GB RAM, over a > period of 2 days, all memory will be consumed. I would love some help > findi

Re: [SM-USERS] Massive memory usage by SquirrelMail - Is this normal?

2003-04-02 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:01:47PM -0500, Lee Brink wrote: > [If this is the wrong forum for this, please let me know] > > I'm running SquirrelMail in production for a mid-sized University (30,000+ > students, staff, & faculty, of simultaneous connections) and I'm > trying to get a sense of the h

Re: [SM-USERS] Autologout

2003-01-27 Thread David Rees
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:04:38PM -0500, Chris Hilts wrote: > > I'm looking thru the settings but I can't find an option for configuring > > auto-logout for inactive users. How should I do? > > You MIGHT be able to do this by setting PHP's session expire time to > however long you want it to wait

Re: [SM-USERS] SM 1.2.10, PHP 4.3.0 and session.bug_compat_42

2003-01-14 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:33:32AM -0600, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, David Rees wrote... > > To reproduce, it's easy: Install PHP 4.3.0 and then run with > > php.ini-recommended in the distribution. With the -recommended ini > > file, next/p

Re: [SM-USERS] SM 1.2.10, PHP 4.3.0 and session.bug_compat_42

2003-01-14 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:20:10AM -0600, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Hello David, > On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, David Rees wrote... > > > I just upgraded a server running SM 1.2.10 to PHP 4.3.0. After > > upgrading, the prev/next and delete&prev/delete&next

[SM-USERS] SM 1.2.10, PHP 4.3.0 and session.bug_compat_42

2003-01-14 Thread David Rees
I just upgraded a server running SM 1.2.10 to PHP 4.3.0. After upgrading, the prev/next and delete&prev/delete&next buttons no longer worked. I saw messages in the error log like this: [error] PHP Notice: Undefined variable: msgs in /usr/local/squirrelmail/squirrelmail-1.2.11-cvs-20030114/src/

Re: [SM-USERS] 1.2.10: Delete/Move/Next Buttons still not right

2002-12-03 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:52:43AM -0600, Jimmy Conner wrote: > > 1. How else should it work? The "With Move" option is a totally > different option all together. "Display at top" is suppose to display > "P/N/DN/Dp" at top. Duh, now I feel stupid. Not enough coffee, I guess. > 2. This is ho