Re: [SM-USERS] What IMAP to run

2003-03-19 Thread jeffc
The main problem I had with uw-imap was that it didn't want to display folders correctly in squirrelmail. I posted a while back about the problem and despite repeated attempts never managed to figure out what was going on with the system. I might take another look at it though. At least I'm not

[SM-USERS] What IMAP to run

2003-03-19 Thread jeffc
Ok, I've been playing around now for a little while and things are getting pretty close to production. I've tried courier and uw-imap and each has its drawbacks. I'm using 1.40rc1 and php 4.3 on a rh 7.3 box and generally like the behavior of courier except for the fact that ALL folders must be c

Re: [SM-USERS] Ugly Ugly Folder Listing

2003-02-07 Thread jeffc
Yeah, I already tried that with no luck. I switched to courier and Maildir, which at least displays the folders correctly in 1.4RC1 Now I just have that annoying everything is a subfolder of Inbox problem. Is there any imap server out there that doesn't have some wierd problem that people recomm

Re: [SM-USERS] Ugly Ugly Folder Listing

2003-02-06 Thread jeffc
Nope, it isn't hiding in the preferences either. I guess I can go to courier and see what happens then. The system isn't production yet, though its getting very close. Anyone else have any idea? > Tried this as well. I'm wondering if they might be appearing because I > have the preference fi

[SM-USERS] Ugly Ugly Folder Listing and uncollasable folders

2003-02-05 Thread jeffc
Using Redhat 7.3 default IMAP (UW) and 1.40RC1 Default Folder prefix is set to mail/. I'm using the basic configs for UW server Problem is, the INBOX isn't collapsable on the left side. Also the subfolders (Draft,Sent,Trash) appear with a "." at the front of their names. Also any folder that i