Re: [SM-USERS] Feature proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Chris Hilts
>> Roger > > Thanks... wasn't meant as an attack against you... just in general... a O I am *SO CONFUSED*. It was an attack on _Scott_ wasn't it? Who the hell is Roger? *sob* My head hurts.. -- Chris Hilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.

Re: [SM-USERS] Feature proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Jonathan Angliss
> Roger Thanks... wasn't meant as an attack against you... just in general... a lot of people seem to do it. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensiv

Re: [SM-USERS] Feature proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Erin Schnabel
Scott Tyson said: > Roger There *is* a happy medium. ;) Erin (ebullient) -- 'Waste of a good apple.' - Samwise Gamgee ICQ: 38670353 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible

Re: [SM-USERS] Feature proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Scott Tyson
Roger --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge --

Re: [SM-USERS] Feature proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Jonathan Angliss
>> 3) Add a link to delete an entire thread for the selected message(s) and >> a link to delete the selected message(s) and all children (replies). >> Optionally, these links would be available while reading a message as >> well as when looking at contents of a folder. > I'd love to see threads Co

Re: [SM-USERS] Feature proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Scott Tyson
The Venerable Jeffrey L. Taylor scribed > SM is the best Webmail package I have found. I am working on a features > that would make me like it more. I have most of these working, mostly. > Instead of keeping these are private patches that I move as I update, I am > thinking of making them plug-i

[SM-USERS] Feature proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
SM is the best Webmail package I have found. I am working on a features that would make me like it more. I have most of these working, mostly. Instead of keeping these are private patches that I move as I update, I am thinking of making them plug-ins, public patches, or folding them into the mai