Re: [SM-USERS] Re: php accelerators

2005-04-11 Thread Daniel Watts
Look at eaccelerator instead - MMCache apparently is no longer being supported, and eaccelerator took over. www.eaccelerator.net Thanks for the link Ricardo. Can anyone confirm fautless use of eaccelerator with squirrelmail / php 4.3.10/11? -

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: php accelerators

2005-04-11 Thread Ricardo Stella
Look at eaccelerator instead - MMCache apparently is no longer being supported, and eaccelerator took over. www.eaccelerator.net Daniel Watts wrote: Paul Lesneiwski wrote: All, After seeing Turck MMCache bite it hard on PHP 4.3.10 (segfaults if you use the cache; optimizer still works), I wa

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: php accelerators

2005-04-09 Thread David Rees
On Apr 8, 2005 4:39 PM, Daniel Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Lesneiwski wrote: > > I just came across what looks to be the most promising alternative so > > far: http://eaccelerator.net/HomeUk This appears to be a MMCache > > extension under current development, except it gives me the

[SM-USERS] Re: php accelerators

2005-04-08 Thread Daniel Watts
Paul Lesneiwski wrote: > All, > > After seeing Turck MMCache bite it hard on PHP 4.3.10 (segfaults if > you use the cache; optimizer still works), I was pretty disappointed, as > the other options aren't appealing (PHPA I found to be dreadfully slow, > think $995/yr amounts to little less than