Re: [sqwebmail] sqwebmail mem hog processes

2003-08-26 Thread Brian Candler
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:01:44PM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Is there any way to get the name of the function that called free(), or the > line number? 'bt' ought to tell you. Maybe bt is limited to a certain stack depth by default? Regards, Brian.

Re: [sqwebmail] sqwebmail mem hog processes

2003-08-26 Thread Jesse Guardiani
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 14:39, Brian Candler wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:44:17PM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > > Probably with '-g' if it's not there already, and make sure you do > > > 'make install' rather than 'make install-strip' otherwise the debug > > > symbols will be removed.

Re: [sqwebmail] sqwebmail mem hog processes

2003-08-26 Thread Brian Candler
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:44:17PM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > Probably with '-g' if it's not there already, and make sure you do 'make > > install' rather than 'make install-strip' otherwise the debug symbols will > > be removed. > > So where would I put the -g? In my configure statement? C

Re: [sqwebmail] sqwebmail mem hog processes

2003-08-26 Thread Jesse Guardiani
On Monday 25 August 2003 12:27, Brian Candler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:53:00AM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > > You could try attaching gdb to the running process: > > > > > >gdb /path/to/sqwebmail pid > > > > > > then do 'bt' to get a backtrace of the current stack frame. Then yo

Re: [sqwebmail] sqwebmail mem hog processes

2003-08-25 Thread Brian Candler
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:53:00AM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > You could try attaching gdb to the running process: > > > >gdb /path/to/sqwebmail pid > > > > then do 'bt' to get a backtrace of the current stack frame. Then you can > > single-step it. This will let you see where this infini

Re: [sqwebmail] sqwebmail mem hog processes

2003-08-25 Thread Jesse Guardiani
On Sunday 24 August 2003 03:36, Brian Candler wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:21:51AM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > I finally got a chance to run ktrace and kdump (freebsd things) > > on my "runaway" sqwebmail processes today. (They don't show > > up terribly often, but when they DO it brin

Re: [sqwebmail] sqwebmail mem hog processes

2003-08-24 Thread Brian Candler
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:21:51AM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > I finally got a chance to run ktrace and kdump (freebsd things) > on my "runaway" sqwebmail processes today. (They don't show > up terribly often, but when they DO it brings my system to a > crawl.) > > Basically, from what I could

[sqwebmail] sqwebmail mem hog processes

2003-08-21 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Howdy list, I finally got a chance to run ktrace and kdump (freebsd things) on my "runaway" sqwebmail processes today. (They don't show up terribly often, but when they DO it brings my system to a crawl.) Basically, from what I could tell, one of these sqwebmail processes would cause 3 or 4 other