Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Segmentation fault Dialog RPC (#1482)

2018-03-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Can you try with the patch from commit 8bc037bc87ced907b8b2e59a2c5fcb45291836fd? It is in master branch, but if all ok, then I will backport. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamai

[sr-dev] git:master:8bc037bc: dialog: skip printing profiles and vars in terminated state for rpc dialog list

2018-03-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Module: kamailio Branch: master Commit: 8bc037bc87ced907b8b2e59a2c5fcb45291836fd URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/8bc037bc87ced907b8b2e59a2c5fcb45291836fd Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Committer: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Date: 2018-03-25T06:34:49+02:00 dialog: skip printing

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] [WIP] tls: add support for OpenSSL engine and private keys in HSM (#1484)

2018-03-24 Thread aalba6675
Packaging is here: stretch: https://packages.debian.org/stretch/softhsm2 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1484#issuecomment-375935623__

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] [WIP] tls: add support for OpenSSL engine and private keys in HSM (#1484)

2018-03-24 Thread Olle E. Johansson
https://www.opendnssec.org/softhsm/ is a software based HSM -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1484#issuecomment-375887257___

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] [WIP] tls: add support for OpenSSL engine and private keys in HSM (#1484)

2018-03-24 Thread Henning Westerholt
Thank you for the detailed explanation, I understand the problem now. Then indeed you need a solution like you implemented. With regards to testing, is there a way to test it also without a HSM module, or exists something like a software "HSM" for testing? @miconda Understood - this is a quite