Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] usrloc: change "-" for "_" in stats name to be prometheus compliant (#2304)

2020-04-29 Thread sergey-safarov
my vote is use `Prometheus` format "_". -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2304#issuecomment-621448415___ Kamailio (SER) -

[sr-dev] git:master:4ea9cdd8: modules: readme files regenerated - permissions ... [skip ci]

2020-04-29 Thread Kamailio Dev
Module: kamailio Branch: master Commit: 4ea9cdd8be210430deac4c88b804ff9ddb622da1 URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/4ea9cdd8be210430deac4c88b804ff9ddb622da1 Author: Kamailio Dev Committer: Kamailio Dev Date: 2020-04-29T22:16:20+02:00 modules: readme files regenerated -

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] usrloc: change "-" for "_" in stats name to be prometheus compliant (#2304)

2020-04-29 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
It can be merged. Then I will add the global parm to set this char. The question is what to make the default, the old dash/minus `-` (for backwards compatibility); or underscore `_`, the new proposal in this PR. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this

[sr-dev] git:master:8a7526bb: permissions: docs for address_file param and address file format

2020-04-29 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Module: kamailio Branch: master Commit: 8a7526bbf35a139c2284ed4641525e3bb194b628 URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/8a7526bbf35a139c2284ed4641525e3bb194b628 Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Committer: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Date: 2020-04-29T22:09:41+02:00 permissions: docs for

[sr-dev] git:master:f376c82a: permissions: support to load address records from a text file

2020-04-29 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Module: kamailio Branch: master Commit: f376c82a9f8cac3d4428450132d4b916e3cda491 URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/f376c82a9f8cac3d4428450132d4b916e3cda491 Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Committer: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Date: 2020-04-29T21:38:59+02:00 permissions: support

[sr-dev] git:master:28f4cab2: dispatcher: use safer macros for temporarily making zero-ending strings

2020-04-29 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Module: kamailio Branch: master Commit: 28f4cab2878b441eb6ddbed03ae7ddbcdbae37e2 URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/28f4cab2878b441eb6ddbed03ae7ddbcdbae37e2 Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Committer: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Date: 2020-04-29T09:43:53+02:00 dispatcher: use safer

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Kamailio service is failed (#2309)

2020-04-29 Thread sergey-safarov
``` Active: failed (Result: start-limit) since Wed 2020-04-29 18:47:26 IST; 860ms ago ``` Looks as kamailio cannot start try manual using ``` su - kamailio -s /bin/bash /usr/sbin/kamailio -DD -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid ``` If required need add `-f $CFGFILE -m $SHM_MEMORY -M $PKG_MEMORY`

[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Kamailio service is failed (#2309)

2020-04-29 Thread rombojack
I recently installed kamailio and it was enabled & started--> Service is active & running But once I added users I see kamailio service is failed [root@rlab111053 kamailio]# systemctl status kamailio ● kamailio.service - Kamailio (OpenSER) - the Open Source SIP Server Loaded: loaded

Re: [sr-dev] Next online devel meeting - Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 14:00UTC

2020-04-29 Thread Fred Posner
Julian, Are you using the browser? (if not can you try using the browser at https://riot.kamailio.dev ) (it's running the latest builds) --fred On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 07:05 -0700, Julien Chavanton wrote: > Error 1 : > Trying to login > Unable to connect to Homeserver. Retrying > > Error 2

Re: [sr-dev] Next online devel meeting - Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 14:00UTC

2020-04-29 Thread Julien Chavanton
I do not think this is a client issue, since I was able to connect earlier. Chromium Version 81.0.4044.122 (Official Build) snap (64-bit) Forefix 74.0 On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 7:05 AM Julien Chavanton wrote: > Error 1 : > Trying to login > Unable to connect to Homeserver. Retrying > >

Re: [sr-dev] Next online devel meeting - Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 14:00UTC

2020-04-29 Thread Julien Chavanton
Error 1 : Trying to login Unable to connect to Homeserver. Retrying Error 2 : Explore rooms : "Riot failed to get the protocol list from the homeserver. The homeserver may be too old to support third party networks." On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 6:41 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello,

Re: [sr-dev] Next online devel meeting - Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 14:00UTC

2020-04-29 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the meeting should start in about 20min, here are the details to join as a guest (without a matrix account):   - go to: https://riot.kamailio.dev/#/welcome   - click on *Room Directory*   - then click on *kamailio* room to join it Should there be any issue, reply to sr-users mailing list

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] TOS field not overtaken by RTPengine (#2303)

2020-04-29 Thread Richard Fuchs
Closed #2303. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2303#event-3284320577___ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] TOS field not overtaken by RTPengine (#2303)

2020-04-29 Thread Richard Fuchs
If you want or need the kind of TOS passthrough you're talking about, feel free to open a feature request over at https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [sr-dev] Next online devel meeting - Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 14:00UTC

2020-04-29 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, quick reminder: online devel meeting today at 14:00 UTC (15:00 London; 16:00 Berlin, Madrid, Paris, Rome, ...; 10:00 New York), to be done on a self hosted Matrix chat room:   * https://riot.kamailio.dev/#/room/#kamailio:matrix.kamailio.dev It is federated, so if you have a matrix

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] TOS field not overtaken by RTPengine (#2303)

2020-04-29 Thread mihovilkolaric
Thank you very much for the clarification. Maybe it would be good to add it to the documentation. The original description of the issue is for sure invalid, and can be closed/rejected. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it