Re: [sr-dev] Kamailio WebRTC

2020-06-30 Thread Mesut Ozturk
Hi Henning, Thanks for kind response. I read many tutorials including link you shared but still couldnt work it. Is it possible you share a working config or i can share my config and you can check ? Regards. From: Henning Westerholt Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 11:11 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - D

[sr-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: kamailiodev-nightly-binaries » i386,xenial #1706

2020-06-30 Thread kamailio
See Changes: -- [...truncated 137.64 KB...] I: new cache content 'libk5crypto3_1.13.2+dfsg-5ubuntu2.1_i386.deb' added I: new cache

[sr-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: kamailiodev-nightly-binaries » amd64,xenial #1706

2020-06-30 Thread kamailio
See Changes: -- [...truncated 140.45 KB...] I: new cache content 'libglib2.0-0_2.48.2-0ubuntu4.6_amd64.deb' added I: new cache con

[sr-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: kamailiodev-nightly-binaries » amd64,precise #1706

2020-06-30 Thread kamailio
See Changes: -- [...truncated 52.46 KB...] Unable to connect to archive.ubuntu.com:http: [IP: 91.189.88.142 80] Err http://arch

[sr-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: kamailiodev-nightly-binaries » i386,precise #1706

2020-06-30 Thread kamailio
See Changes: -- [...truncated 53.44 KB...] Unable to connect to archive.ubuntu.com:http: [IP: 91.189.88.152 80] Err http://archi

[sr-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: kamailiodev-nightly-binaries » i386,trusty #1706

2020-06-30 Thread kamailio
See Changes: -- [...truncated 59.68 KB...] Unable to connect to archive.ubuntu.com:http: [IP: 2001:67c:1562::18 80] Err http://ar

[sr-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: kamailiodev-nightly-binaries » amd64,trusty #1706

2020-06-30 Thread kamailio
See Changes: -- [...truncated 54.95 KB...] Err http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates/main python3.4 amd64 3.4.3-1ubunt

[sr-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: kamailiodev-nightly-binaries » i386,bionic #1706

2020-06-30 Thread kamailio
See Changes: -- [...truncated 125.49 KB...] I: new cache content 'libpython3.6-dev_3.6.9-1~18.04ubuntu1_i386.deb' added I: new cach

[sr-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: kamailiodev-nightly-binaries » amd64,bionic #1706

2020-06-30 Thread kamailio
See Changes: -- [...truncated 127.59 KB...] I: new cache content 'readline-common_7.0-3_all.deb' added I: new cache content 'libel

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] cnxcc: remove duplicated entries with a same CID value (#2383)

2020-06-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
The t_precheck_trans() and t_check_trans() should help filtering out such retransmissions. Anyhow, again, the only concern is about the case when one wants to charge a call twice (or even more), either from same billing account or from different accounts... not sure how the PR affects such case

[sr-dev] dlgs module, unsued variable w_dlgs_tags_count

2020-06-30 Thread Henning Westerholt
Hello, Just noticed this, not sure if this is caused from work in progress code: henning@static:~/repositories/kamailio/src/modules/dlgs$ make CC (gcc) [M dlgs.so]dlgs_mod.o dlgs_mod.c:264:12: warning: 'w_dlgs_tags_count' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 264 | static int w_

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] hiops moduls refer to (#1856) (#2209)

2020-06-30 Thread Henning Westerholt
@miconda I had a conversation with the author of the pull request, he wants to rework the code substancially. I don't think this should be merged in this form. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.c

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

2020-06-30 Thread Henning Westerholt
@miconda I had a conversation with the author of the pull request, he wants to rework the code substancially. I don't think this should be merged in this form. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.c

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] mqueue: add support for db persistency (#2359)

2020-06-30 Thread Julien Chavanton
Thanks for having a look, I did persmission adjustments and moved the variable declarations to beginning of scope. I did not run clang-format, I tried to keep the formatting that was used in the module before. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this em

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] mqueue: add support for db persistency (#2359)

2020-06-30 Thread Julien Chavanton
@jchavanton pushed 1 commit. c85da32333237359f9e8b9cfe6715437458c04a8 mqueue: add support for db persistency -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2359/files/770edc50a5fa35853230bd0704c62456bdeacb85..c8

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] cnxcc: remove duplicated entries with a same CID value (#2383)

2020-06-30 Thread Jose Luis Verdeguer
Sure. It supposed to be called only for the initial INVITE but there are a check in the code for that (which log message was fixed yesterday by @linuxmaniac). The problem is that this check only print a message and has no control the insertion of the new record. I've found the problem in some c

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Function "tcp_get_conid" from tcpops module does not write the conid into given target variable (#2382)

2020-06-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
The code looks ok for setting the variable. Can you provide all logs printed by kamailio with debug=3 in config, from the moment of receiving the sip message till its end of processing, when this case is reproduce? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to th

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] cnxcc: remove duplicated entries with a same CID value (#2383)

2020-06-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
I guess the function was supposed to be called only for the initial INVITE, the one that creates the call. Overall, I do not use that much the module to have an opinion of this is good to have or someone also wants to charge a call twice (e.g., incoming leg and outgoing leg). The initial develo

[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] cnxcc: remove duplicated entries with a same CID value (#2383)

2020-06-30 Thread Jose Luis Verdeguer