[sr-dev] git:master:a2932492: tcpops: target variable passed on tcp_get_conid function was empty

2020-07-04 Thread kvrban
Module: kamailio Branch: master Commit: a2932492e24ac3c3afe4d33f025c7501c93fda49 URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/a2932492e24ac3c3afe4d33f025c7501c93fda49 Author: kvrban Committer: kvrban Date: 2020-07-02T10:09:09+02:00 tcpops: target variable passed on tcp_get_conid function

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Function "tcp_get_conid" from tcpops module does not write the conid into given target variable (#2382)

2020-07-03 Thread kvrban
fixed with https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/fbb4312f1b2ebf6793408241d56bfc2dca6543ec -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2382#issuecomment-653407456_

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Function "tcp_get_conid" from tcpops module does not write the conid into given target variable (#2382)

2020-07-03 Thread kvrban
Closed #2382. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2382#event-3509986104___ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List sr-dev@l

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Function "tcp_get_conid" from tcpops module does not write the conid into given target variable (#2382)

2020-07-03 Thread kvrban
Issue was fixed for me with: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2386 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2382#issuecomment-653399719__

[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] tcpops: target variable passed on tcp_get_conid function was empty (#2386)

2020-07-02 Thread kvrban
Adding the additional flag PV_TYPE_INT fixed the issue i reported on https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2382 You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2386 -- Commit Summary -- * tcpops: target variable passed on tcp_g

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Function "tcp_get_conid" from tcpops module does not write the conid into given target variable (#2382)

2020-07-01 Thread kvrban
``` Jul 1 14:49:27 debian10 kamailio[5644]: 9(5655) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 5786fc5eb54a-4wh0mpzuxwx6@snomSoft}

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Function "tcp_get_conid" from tcpops module does not write the conid into given target variable (#2382)

2020-07-01 Thread kvrban
Then called a uac which is registered via TCP -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2382#issuecomment-652358376___ Kamailio (SE

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Function "tcp_get_conid" from tcpops module does not write the conid into given target variable (#2382)

2020-07-01 Thread kvrban
To reproduce, i installed a new Kamailio 5.3.5 from http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio53 on a fresh debian 10 vm and only added: ``` --- kamailio.cfg2020-06-22 14:21:22.0 +0200 +++ /home/kris/kamailio.cfg 2020-07-01 13:07:15.476661500 +0200 @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ # Several features c

[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Function "tcp_get_conid" from tcpops module does not write the conid into given target variable (#2382)

2020-06-30 Thread kvrban
Function "tcp_get_conid" from tcpops module does not write the conid into target variable I followed the documentation on https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tcpops.html#tcpops.f.tcp_get_conid And with debug enabled, you see the connection is found: `Jun 30 14:13:47 kamailio-de

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] allow more than one tcp/tls connection to same destination (#1107)

2020-02-17 Thread kvrban
> When K connects to another SIP proxy over TCP or TLS, the connection is > shared for all requests to that destination. If the receiving SIP proxy is K, > it means that only one worker process is handling all those requests. This > may become a bottleneck if processing of requests is time consu

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Frequently TCP/TLS sessions remain in CLOSE_WAIT (#1881)

2019-03-05 Thread kvrban
> Try by setting this core parameter: > > * https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#tcp_linger2 Tried out just now with "tcp_linger2=5" and restarted Kamailio. No effect. Also documentation say it for FIN_WAIT2 not for CLOSE_WAIT state. -- You are receiving this because you are

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Frequently TCP/TLS sessions remain in CLOSE_WAIT (#1881)

2019-03-05 Thread kvrban
> I have see similar behavior on CentOS with default network initialization > subsystem. > After I reconfigured to use `systemd-networkd` instead default network > initialization, then i not see more "CLOSE_WAIT". > > Could you reconfigure network using `systemd-networkd` and then retest. Hey s

[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Frequently TCP/TLS sessions remain in CLOSE_WAIT (#1881)

2019-03-05 Thread kvrban
### Description On our setup with Kamailio 5.2.1 with users connected via TLS. i see frequently TCP/TLS sessions remain in CLOSE_WAIT: netstat -ntp |grep CLOSE tcp 238 0 172.17.217.10:5061 xxx.xxx.xxx.218:52613 CLOSE_WAIT 117912/kamailio tcp 4681 0 172.17.2