Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine : add node fallback if node ran out of ports (#2621)

2021-02-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Merged #2621 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2621#event-4291630577___ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine : add node fallback if node ran out of ports (#2621)

2021-02-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
OK, thanks! Going to merge it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2621#issuecomment-773409527___ Kamailio (SER) - Development

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine : add node fallback if node ran out of ports (#2621)

2021-02-04 Thread Richard Fuchs
> I haven't looked at the source code or the protocol, is there a > response/error code that can be used instead of the text? Well, it would have to be added :) We don't currently return error codes, but ideally something like that should be used instead of the text. But as we don't have that

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine : add node fallback if node ran out of ports (#2621)

2021-02-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
I haven't looked at the source code or the protocol, is there a response/error code that can be used instead of the text? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine : add node fallback if node ran out of ports (#2621)

2021-02-04 Thread Richard Fuchs
> @rfuchs - any opinion on this PR? Personally I wouldn't want to rely on a textual error message to control behaviour, but it's already been done before. So fine with me. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: