Closed #1719.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1719#event-1990169233___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
I added notes in docs that msg_apply_changes() may be required for each of
multi-part manipulation functions. You can make pull requests if you want to
add more there or other content.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it
Is "append_body_part" usage mandatory here?
Can we use next example if required "SDP + one additional content"
```
set_body_multipart("test", "text/plain", "delimiter");
msg_apply_changes();
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or
Trying to figure out what solution worked and has to be given in the docs -- is
it the next one?
```
set_body_multipart("test", "text/plain", "delimiter");
msg_apply_changes();
append_body_part(...);
msg_apply_changes();
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Daniel @miconda please look this
[textops](https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.2.x/modules/textops.html#textops.f.set_body_multipart)
doc page
Here is present usage example:
```
set_body_multipart("test", "text/plain", "delimiter");
msg_apply_changes();
append_body_part(...);
```
first two
In your 2nd comment above, I think you wrote same function name:
```
... use msg_apply_changes after msg_apply_changes ...
```
probably you wanted to say a different function name there, right?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or
Also questions
Is need fix packet modifications when called "set_body_multipart" with 3
arguments?
Please look original description.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Think requirement of use msg_apply_changes after `msg_apply_changes` is need to
add.
Is required add protections to prevent crash when admin not applied changes?
May be set flag that need to call `msg_apply_changes` and when call processing
is finished check flag. If flag is set, then log error
Is this a lack of mention in the docs that msg_apply_changes() has to be used?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Thanks @sergey-vb
I have tested your suggestions. In this case message is converted to multipart
properly.
Looks as issue when added new body part.
Related to https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1631
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this
Sorry for delay.
But according to doc for textops module:
Set multipart body to a SIP message. If called with **no parameters, will
convert present body** to multipart.
So if you have look at my part of CFG:
1. I use **set_body_multipart(,"2123894789_1257887457");** to convert Corrent
current
Thanks @sergey-vb
I have done this and tested.
Please looks messages
1) [config
change](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1719#issuecomment-437619001);
2)
[logs](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1719#issuecomment-437619183).
--
You are receiving this because you are
> This may be related to log
>
> ```
> 16(27) ERROR: {1 21 INVITE 1851253425} [core/msg_translator.c:3290]:
> sip_msg_apply_changes(): cannot apply msg changes after adding record-route
> header - it breaks conditional 2nd header
> ```
>
> Think in this case must be send original INVITE.
Hi.
```
26(174) DEBUG: tm [h_table.c:133]: free_cell_helper(): freeing transaction
0x7f289269dd08 from timer.c:654
16(164) DEBUG: [core/udp_server.c:514]: udp_rcv_loop(): probing packet
received from 192.168.100.28 50195
13(161) DEBUG: [core/udp_server.c:491]: udp_rcv_loop(): received on udp
Same results when used UDP transport on caller and callee legs.
And when `set_body_multipart` is applied at start of `request_route` block
```
/* Main SIP request routing logic
* - processing of any incoming SIP request starts with this route
* - note: this is the same as route { ... } */
This may be related to log
```
16(27) ERROR: {1 21 INVITE 1851253425} [core/msg_translator.c:3290]:
sip_msg_apply_changes(): cannot apply msg changes after adding record-route
header - it breaks conditional 2nd header
```
Think in this case must be send original INVITE.
--
You are receiving
INVITE after modification is present in packet 16 of pcap file
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
### Description
I want convert INVITE message with SDP body to multypart body. To do this is
used patch for reference kamailio.cfg
```
[root@safarov-dell kamailio]# diff -u kamailio.cfg kamailio2.cfg
--- kamailio.cfg2018-11-09 18:28:36.0 +0300
+++ kamailio2.cfg 2018-11-10
18 matches
Mail list logo
